Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxesareforever; Ichneumon; Thatcherite
Gumlegs: I didn't want to know whether you thought your interpretation of the Bible should be taught in schools, I wanted to know why it should control what's taught in science class.

tasesareforever: What is taught is schools is the same thing as being taught in science class. At least that's the way it was when I went to school.

Hmmm. So "what's taught in schools is the same thing as being taught in science class." I take that as a "yes," although your inability or unwillingness to answer the question in a straightforward manner should be noted.

How did your school -- since you tell us the classes in it were undifferentiated -- how did your school explain how it can be that locusts have four legs and that rabbits chew their cud, even though no evidence for this whatever?

571 posted on 10/10/2005 4:04:27 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs

In modern English, animals that ‘chew the cud’ are called ruminants. They hardly chew their food when first eaten, but swallow it into a special stomach where the food is partially digested. Then it is regurgitated, chewed again, and swallowed into a different stomach. Animals which do this include cows, sheep and goats, and they all have four stomachs. Coneys and rabbits are not ruminants in this modern sense.

However, the Hebrew phrase for ‘chew the cud’ simply means ‘raising up what has been swallowed’. Coneys and rabbits go through such similar motions to ruminants that Linnaeus, the father of modern classification (and a creationist), at first classified them as ruminants. Also, rabbits and hares practise refection, which is essentially the same principle as rumination, and does indeed ‘raise up what has been swallowed’. The food goes right through the rabbit and is passed out as a special type of dropping. These are re-eaten, and can now nourish the rabbit as they have already been partly digested.

It is not an error of Scripture that ‘chewing the cud’ now has a more restrictive meaning than it did in Moses’ day. Indeed, rabbits and hares do ‘chew the cud’ in an even more specific sense. Once again, the Bible is right and the sceptics are wrong.


594 posted on 10/10/2005 9:54:21 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson