To: Map Kernow
Your position would be tenable had not the same senator who yesterday just about said he will not vote for Miers voted for Ginsburg.
In my humble opinion, any Republican senator who winds up voting against Harriet Miers after having had voted for Ruth Bader Ginsburg should be kicked out of the Republican Party or be stripped of all committee assignments (just like the Democrats did to Traficant).
To: RepublicanWithIntegrity
Is there a list of those?
32 posted on
10/06/2005 3:48:18 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: RepublicanWithIntegrity
"Your position would be tenable had not the same senator who yesterday just about said he will not vote for Miers voted for Ginsburg."
It's strange, isn't it, that Ginsburg is still considered "qualified," even though it's perfectly evident to everyone that she hasn't the slightest idea what the Consitution actually means.
No matter. It must be the case that postmodernists and crazy ACLU lawyers deserve republican votes, while Miers doesn't.
To: RepublicanWithIntegrity
Your position would be tenable had not the same senator who yesterday just about said he will not vote for Miers voted for Ginsburg.So what??? You people carry "party loyalty" to a ridiculous level. That's the whole point of Pat's article. Confirm someone because she's good for the country---not just on one man's say-so.
40 posted on
10/06/2005 3:51:54 PM PDT by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: RepublicanWithIntegrity
"any Republican senator who winds up voting against Harriet Miers after having had voted for Ruth Bader Ginsburg should be kicked out of the Republican Party"
Very good point. I agree wholeheartedly.
To: RepublicanWithIntegrity
Sorry about that -- you beat me to it. LOL.
Great point.
181 posted on
10/06/2005 5:13:54 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson