What a nonsensical statement. Here's the record:
2004 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy's calculations, in 2004, Senator Cornyn voted more liberal on social policy issues than 0 percent of the Senators.
2004 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy's calculations, in 2004, Senator Cornyn voted more liberal on economic policy issues than 5 percent of the Senators.
2004 According to the National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy calculations, in 2004 Senator Cornyn voted more conservative on economic policy issues than 91 percent of Senators.
2004 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy's calculations, in 2004, Senator Cornyn voted more liberal on foreign policy issues than 33 percent of the Senators.
2004 According to the National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy's calculations, in 2004, Senator Cornyn voted more conservative on foreign policy issues than 61 percent of the Senators.
2004 According to the National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy's calculations, in 2004, Senator Cornyn voted more conservative on social policy issues than 84 percent of the Senators.
2003 According to the National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy's calculations, in 2003, Senator Cornyn voted more conservative on economic policy issues than 82 percent of the Senators.
With instant search, why do people insist on making false and innacurate staements on FR???
Sen Cornyn is a good conservative. I think the GOP should consider him as a candidate in '08.
Regarding Reid and Leahy, I have to wonder if they knew Ms Miers was pro life and a fundamentalist Christian when they suggested her as a candidate for the court.
He was kidding.