Will's column is eloquent, as always, and brutal. Well argued.
I personally have decided, not that it matters to anyone, that the nomination should be opposed. Chiefly because I agree with Will that this is not a serious nomination on Bush's part.
Granted, she'll probably be confirmed and probably work out. She's probably a fine person. Appears to be smart and to be a hard worker and tough minded. Appears to be pro-life, etc. etc.
I'm even buoyed by the reports that she became a Republican after she became a Christian.
However, bottom line is this:
Just like I don't think it's wise to take a new Christian convert and appoint them to lead a major ministry (because they are not yet solidly grounded), I don't think it's wise to take a recent convert (a decade being "recent" in her long career) conversion to Republican and put her on the Supreme Court. Not when you had so many seasoned qualified rock solid conservatives to choose from.
My opinion.
Although I'm not firmly decided, I'm leaning toward yours and Will's line of thinking.