Posted on 10/04/2005 2:46:19 PM PDT by defconw
LISTEN TO MARK LEVIN ONLINE AND JOIN THE DISCUSSION
6-8PM Eastern
Will we hear
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU MORON, or
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU BIG JERK, or
GET OFF THE PHONE YOU DOPE
you're UNDER GOD!!
Thank you!!!!
Who got hit in the game?
I having a bit of trouble with the knee jerk reactions.
lol!
He didn't last 5 years, he stabbed us in the back in Casey. You could not have forseen Kennedy as an apostate Catholic and a penumbrist. None of you knew him the way Bush knows Harriet Miers, the AG notwithstanding.
The point being that even under the best of circumstances it is difficult to be sure. You try to limit the vulnerability. So, if the point is that vetting isn't perfect, that's obvioius. But that's a defense of your position.
Vetting can never be perfect but it can be much more reliable when the guy doing the appointing has had a very close relationship with the appointee over many years.
OK now I am confused am I a whining idiot or and idiot whiner? I just can't keep up with this. But! On January 20, 2009 When Hillary Rotten takes the oath of office, I don't want to hear it!
LOL! Oh it would be a sad, sad day for MLB if I ever played for the Red Sox.
The cuss jar would be overflowing in the first 10 seconds.
When Senator Leaky wanted to confront Cheney as a "friend" after trashing him, I wanted to see Leaky picking up his teeth from the floor, but don't fault Cheney for being more composed than I would have been.
Nixon resigned because he thought it would be the best thing for the country, however, it turned out to be the WORST thing for the country. Now the DUmocrats use the same tactics to undermine President Bush. Too many are focused on the narrow vision of this one pick.
At this point, probably the whole audience LOL! 3 players were hit! Honestly, I have never seen us play so badly.
Just saw you want Steinbrenner back... please come get him.
"I appreciate anyone who either agrees with the nomination,or disagrees with it as long as they have a VALID argument for their position!
I having a bit of trouble with the knee jerk reactions."
Exactly! That's why I'm trying to explain why we need to understand Mark's anger and frustration. He has VALID reasons. As for the trolls and troublemakers, to He-- with them!!
Send me addresses and I can sign special stickers the publisher gave me which can put inside the book.
The President hasn't picked a liberal for the court yet .. that is why I trust
But since I don't know much about her ... that is why I question .. to get more information
And then I will make an opinion one way or another if she is a good or bad choice
I've asked this before ..
Why is it so wrong to want to find out more information before we cast judgment and throw Meirs out the window??
I don't get that
Send address to where Mark? WABC or FReep mail?
WOW. Will do, thanks.
Maybe Bush does not want to go to war with Lincoln chafing and snow and collins. I hope this works out. At least he knew her for 20 years unlike Souter. I do share your concerns.
You seem to be arguing that improving the vetting process means knowing even less about the judicial philosophy of the candidate -- president has given us any facts. But if this is the new test you like, so be it.
The pressure of being an openly conservative justice on SCOTUS has to be tremendous. It would be really difficult to figure out who has that kind of fortitude in advance.
Lib Alert!
I am getting thirsty.... ahem!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.