Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manny613
In truth, intelligent design isn't a scientific theory but a restatement of a timeless argument: that the regularity and laws of the natural world imply a higher intelligence — G-d, most people would say — responsible for its design. Intelligent design doesn't argue that evidence of design ends all questions or disproves Darwin. It doesn't make a religious claim. It does say that when such evidence appears, researchers should take it into account, and that the weaknesses in Darwinian theory should be acknowledged as forthrightly as the strengths [emphases added].

1) "intelligent design isn't a scientific theory." No comment necessary.

2) "when such evidence appears." What evidence?

6 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:37 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

you mean like the evidence that doesnt appear with Darwinism, evidence like that?


7 posted on 10/03/2005 3:47:46 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Presently in Beijing China.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson