In truth, intelligent design isn't a scientific theory but a restatement of a timeless argument: that the regularity and laws of the natural world imply a higher intelligence G-d, most people would say responsible for its design. Intelligent design doesn't argue that evidence of design ends all questions or disproves Darwin. It doesn't make a religious claim. It does say that when such evidence appears, researchers should take it into account, and that the weaknesses in Darwinian theory should be acknowledged as forthrightly as the strengths [emphases added].1) "intelligent design isn't a scientific theory." No comment necessary.
2) "when such evidence appears." What evidence?
you mean like the evidence that doesnt appear with Darwinism, evidence like that?