1) Did you read Dembski's explanation that I linked to?
2) Do you have any logical responses other than the two I listed: 1) deny that phenomenon exist beyond the ability of science to explain, or 2) admit science needs to grow.
You have yet to offer a reason to support your view.
deny that phenomenon exist beyond the ability of science to explain,
Duh...there are always phenomenon currently beyond the ability of science to explain. That's what scientists do for a living. They try to find explanations.
admit science needs to grow.
Duh...science is always trying to expand scientific knowledge (=growing) by exploring the unknown and seeking explanations.
Also, I don't think game analogies are valid, I don't expect to convince you of my view (and all that implies), and I need sleep.