LOL - yeah.
Let's stop talking about the masses here, and let's talk about you. You made a positive statement -- that no transitional fossils exist to support existing models of hominin evolution.
I proved you wrong. And then you turned the argument back on me, saying that science and I aren't persuasive. Well, why aren't we? What is it that keeps you from accepting scientific evidence or the scientific method? How do you dismiss all this out of hand? You say you don't believe it because you don't believe it, but you don't say why.