Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueSky194
Three things I see this article doesn't mention:
  1. What is the energy in to usable fuel energy out ratio for this process? How does it compare plain old hydrogen from electrolysis?
  2. What is the volumetric energy density of the hydrogen generating zinc + water fuel? How does it compare to plain old liquefied hydrogen?
  3. What is the potential energy output of this process?
Granted, I could pull out my CRC and do the math to answer some of these questions, but I'm feeling lazy right now. However, the fact that these basic questions are not addressed in this article raises some warning flags.
6 posted on 09/29/2005 8:29:54 PM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pillbox_girl
Granted, I could pull out my CRC and do the math to answer some of these questions, but I'm feeling lazy right now.

Don't you have a tungsten cowhide turbo encabulator handy to do the work for you? ; )

9 posted on 09/29/2005 8:37:42 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: pillbox_girl

Metal ores require mining operations.
Charcoal requires logging operations.
Both of these operations require fuel.


22 posted on 09/30/2005 6:17:13 AM PDT by Frankss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson