Replies

I suspect most of them couldn't care less about the evolution v. creation/ID debate.

It is a non-debate among scientists. Biologists take it as a given due to the tremendous amount of data that support it.

why have they collectively not been able to fill in the gaps in the ToE?

What gaps would those be? The fossil record is strong enough to stand on its own. The genetic evidence is so overwhelming one would have to be either wilfully ignorant or a member of the OJ jury to not accept it.

What gaps would those be? The fossil record is strong enough to stand on its own. The genetic evidence is so overwhelming one would have to be either wilfully ignorant...

King Prout: I stated there are gaps in the fossil record.

Have you two met?

Also, Miller, the lead witness for the plaintiff's, admitted there were gaps in the ToE.

What gaps would those be? The fossil record is strong enough to stand on its own. The genetic evidence is so overwhelming one would have to be either willfully ignorant or a member of the OJ jury to not accept it.

The fossil record is strong, The genetic evidence is so overwhelming.

Perhaps.. and the conclusions of this evidence can lead to your path.. that you already have the answer and its all contained in the material world, or my path to that it is he (with no name or infinite names) who IS beyond all creation.

BTW I knew people from Genentech in the mid 90's where I kept a sailboat at the Brisbane marina, hung out with a few of them. Yes.. they were more educated than me in the things they specialized in, but they were not any wiser, nor necessarily 'thought better' in the rest of the world.

Wolf