Replies

As for Frist. You make my point. according to you he is guilty until proved innocent. Just go hide in the corner until the dust settles and oh, don't bother to vote in 2006 because we probably won't win a single seat or manage to keep what we have....right?

Like I said, you make me sick.

You must be an idiot. Someone isn't guilty until a jury finds him guilty...only in a legal sense, but in the court of public opinion and in personal judgement one can be found guilty much earlier than it takes the process to run in the courts.

Let's try a little reverse logic on your position. Clinton was impeached, however he was never convicted. Does that mean he wasn't guilty to you? Or does that mean he just got off (pun intended).

Another example, the clintons were never indicted for campaign finance fraud/abuse; however, does that mean they are innocent?

Oh and another. Scott Peterson murdered his wife and unborn trial, but prior to his conviction were you claiming he's innocent or did you make up your mind based on the fact you heard.

Finally, did OJ murder his wife? By your logic it's not possible because he was found not guilty.

NOTE: to all that read this...this is in answer to the Frist charges not Delay.

As far as your need to keep personally attacking me, shows thy type of person you are...a bung holio.

First of all, telling you you make me sick is hardly an attack on you. However you calling me an IDIOT most certainly IS an attack.

As far as your examples, those that believed Clinton guilty where Republicans and the left whether they believed him guilty or not did not waiver in their support.

As for the campaign finance irregularities they GAVE BACK the money to the Chinese and the Monks so that was an admission, whether their was an indictment or not.

Finally, you are missing my point. I didn't say Frist or Delay were not guilty. I was referring to the fact that people like yourself immediately throw the towel in, wave your arms about and go into your the Henny Penny routine