To: MineralMan
The complexity of life is evidence enough for some people to believe in creation. And you don't have to go to a museum to see it. It can be found in most research labs. Why do evolutionists not consider that to be a valid evidence for creation but consider the fossilized skeletons of dead animals to be evidence for theirs? Fossils show that something was once alive and now is dead. It's human reasoning that puts them in a certain order and declares that it supports an idea they have.
127 posted on
09/26/2005 8:25:07 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
"The complexity of life is evidence enough for some people to believe in creation." ... "Why do evolutionists not consider that to be a valid evidence for creation"
Because 'Wow... cool!' isn't a part of scientific investigation.
168 posted on
09/26/2005 11:24:29 AM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson