Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coconutt2000

Chuckie and Durbin just pissed me off. They were constantly trying to find out what "causes" Judge Roberts supports and he keep coming back that as a Judge he supports neither side of a cause and rules solely on the law. The two D#$ks couldn't get it through their thick skulls.


5 posted on 09/25/2005 5:12:12 AM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: neb52

The two D#$ks are stuck on stupid.


12 posted on 09/25/2005 6:39:14 AM PDT by aviator (Armored Pest Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: neb52
Roberts said that before the Supreme Court, whoever presents the best argument consistent with the law should win. I agree with him that a right of privacy exists, whether that emcompasses a right to abortion is dubious. Casey simply said that it rests on precedent alone Blackmun's rationale was ignored. I think we know now that even Blackmun wanted only a limited right that would enable doctors to handle hard cases without threat of liability. Even Planned Parenthhood never expected the torrent of abortions that followed Roe. The" woman's right to choice" has worked out pretty much like "separate but equal."--badly. THAT is the fact situation now.
18 posted on 09/25/2005 9:13:45 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson