That is my understanding of the ADA as well.
Either way, as unfortunate as this situation is, the man did of his own free will forfeit his claim on the animal. Sure, the woman in question is being a butthead...but there is no law against it.
I will pray that this woman comes to her senses and does the right thing. But I cannot in good conscience badger anyone for this guy's poor judgment.
In the eye's of the law, he did sign away his beloved pet. But here is the question, it wasn't as if he had a choice at that moment in time. He was unable to find a roof for his family.
Did he have additional resources that we are not told about, I do not know. But, it seems that events after Katrina provided hardship for this family in many ways, not that they are worse than any other person's troubles from the event but each feel that they are the only one's in the world dealing with what is in front of them.
Perhaps it would have great had the temp digs owner allow them to retain the pup while they located a permanent home. Hind sight is 20/20 but I feel confident I would have made that exception. Another thought, asking for help from a local vet/kennel. I imagine that money was the issue, moving, losing everything and looking for a home. Additional bills perhaps weighed heavy on the man? It is just a thought.
I am tickled with the way that Texas handled this issue, making arrangements for those who are pet owner's as well. My cousin who lives in Biloxi, said, one of her friends died remaining with her pet's, there were just alternatives and it cost her, her life. For some, the pet's are a member of the family. So, taking on this logistical nightmare I am sure improved the number's of those who evacuated, I hope other states will consider the same plans in their future emergency planning.
You have given a thoughtful comment, and I appreciate that, actually your comment's are always of such a nature so thank you.