Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would Reagan do?(Ann Coulter)
wnd.com ^ | September 21, 2005 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/21/2005 4:37:17 PM PDT by perfect stranger

Perhaps President Bush has inadvertently nominated a true conservative to the court with this Roberts fellow. I remain skeptical based on the following facts:

Anita Hill has not stepped forward to accuse Roberts of sexual harassment.

The Democrats did not accuse Roberts of having a secret life as a racist.

We have no idea what kind of videos he rents.

Also, I'm still steamed that Bush has now dashed my dreams of an all-black Supreme Court composed of eight more Clarence Thomases. Incidentally, eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support.

As liberal Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in the New Yorker, Roberts was a scared choice. After Hurricane Katrina, Bush was even more scared. So when he had to pick a chief justice, he renominated the Rorschach blot.

For Christians, it's "What Would Jesus Do?" For Republicans, it's "What Would Reagan Do?" Bush doesn't have to be Reagan; he just has to consult his WWRD bracelet. If Bush had followed the WWRD guidelines, he would have nominated Antonin Scalia for the chief justiceship.

As proof, I refer you to the evidence. When Reagan had an opening for chief justice, he nominated Associate Justice William Rehnquist. While liberals were preoccupied staging die-ins against Rehnquist and accusing him of chasing black people away from the polls with a stick – something they did not accuse Roberts of – Reagan slipped Scalia onto the court.

That's what Reaganesque presidents with a five-vote margin in the Senate typically do. Apart from toppling the Soviet Empire, Scalia remains Reagan's greatest triumph.

Scalia deserved the chief justiceship. He's the best man for the job. He has suffered lo these many years with Justices Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor. He believes in a sedentary judiciary. He's for judicial passivism. Scalia also would have been the first cigar-smoking, hot-blooded Italian chief justice, which I note the diversity crowd never mentions.

But most important, if Bush had nominated Scalia, liberals would have responded with their usual understated screams of genocide, and Bush could have nominated absolutely anyone to fill Justice O'Connor's seat. He also could have cut taxes, invaded Syria, and bombed North Korea and Cuba just for laughs. He could even have done something totally nuts, like enforce the immigration laws.

Even if Roberts turns out to be another Rehnquist (too much to hope for another Scalia!), we don't know that, Bush doesn't know that, and Bush has blown a golden opportunity to make Chuck Schumer the public face of the Democratic Party. A few weeks of Schumer as their spokesman, and normal Democrats would be clamoring for Howard Dean to get back on the stick. Teddy Kennedy would start showing up at hearings actually holding a double scotch.

Inasmuch as Bush must still choose a replacement for O'Connor, it's important to remember the "Sandra Day O'Connor bylaw" to the WWRD guidelines: Never appoint anyone like Sandra Day O'Connor to any court at any level.

Reagan had made a campaign promise to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. He didn't say anything about appointing a ninny. But back in 1981, it was slim pickings for experienced female judges. O'Connor was a terrible mistake and will forever mar Reagan's record, but at least he did it only once.

Bush has already fulfilled all his campaign promises to liberals – and then some! He said he'd be a "compassionate conservative," which liberals interpreted to mean that he would bend to their will, enact massive spending programs, and be nice to liberals. When Bush won the election, that sealed the deal. It meant the Democrats won.

Consequently, Bush has enacted massive new spending programs, obstinately refused to deal with illegal immigration, opposed all conservative Republicans in their primary races, and invited Teddy Kennedy over for movie night. He's even sent his own father to socialize with aging porn star Bill Clinton.

(Sidebar on the aging porn star: Idiot Republicans fraternizing with the Clintons has not harmed the decadent buffoon's reputation abroad. A Chinese condom manufacturer recently named one of its condoms the "Clinton," a fitting tribute to the man who had Monica Lewinsky perform oral sex on him in the Oval Office on Easter Sunday. Their advertising slogans are: "Always wear a 'Clinton' when you're getting a 'Lewinsky'!"; "I still believe in a place called the G-spot"; "Extra-thin skinned!"; "For when you really, really want to feel her pain." Note to Bush: This isn't Walter Mondale. How about sending Pops on the road with Joey Buttafuoco?)

According to my WWRD wristwatch, it's time for Bush to invade Grenada, bomb Libya, fire the air traffic controllers, and joke about launching a first strike against the Soviet Union. In lieu of that, how about nominating a conservative to O'Connor's seat on the court? It would be a bold gesture.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; ronaldreagan; wwrd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2005 4:37:24 PM PDT by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy; Rummyfan

ping to the weekly Coulter


2 posted on 09/21/2005 4:40:30 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Oh, boy. Well, we can expect plenty of dumb weight jokes and similar junk on these threads this week.


3 posted on 09/21/2005 4:45:32 PM PDT by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Wow...she looks about 19 in that picture!!


4 posted on 09/21/2005 4:45:44 PM PDT by RockinRight (What part of ILLEGAL immigration do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Bush needs to appoint Janice Rogers Brown. The democrats won't be able to hold back playing the race card. It will be a golden opporunity to get the focus off of W's problems and right back on the dems being a bunch of wackos.


5 posted on 09/21/2005 4:46:34 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Geez Ann...how do you really feel....

This wasn't as much as a slam to Roberts as a slam to Bush.....

NeverGore :^)


6 posted on 09/21/2005 4:48:16 PM PDT by nevergore (“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

Right on Anne. If Roberts turns out to be a Souter and W nominates another O'Connor, his legacy is mud. I pray he nominates a true consrvative, and we have a knock-down drag-out battle for him/her.


7 posted on 09/21/2005 4:49:11 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

BTTT


8 posted on 09/21/2005 4:50:54 PM PDT by Gritty ("Eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support" - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Someone aught to throw that girl a sammich!!

How was that AZ Cowboy??


9 posted on 09/21/2005 4:52:29 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
We can't have a too strong conservative presence on the SCOTUS. Lest the liberals poop in their diapers.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
10 posted on 09/21/2005 4:57:46 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
We can't have a too strong conservative presence on the SCOTUS. Lest the liberals poop in their diapers.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
11 posted on 09/21/2005 4:58:12 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support.
- Ann Coulter
12 posted on 09/21/2005 4:59:06 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Apart from toppling the Soviet Empire, Scalia remains Reagan's greatest triumph.

Too bad most of his best opinions are dissents. Scalia's been wasted, for the most part.

13 posted on 09/21/2005 4:59:24 PM PDT by Huck (There's nothing you can hold for very long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The highlights:

Incidentally, eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support.

He could even have done something totally nuts, like enforce the immigration laws.

Bush has a lot of faith in Roberts, though. The hearings did at least point out that the man has a sense of humor. Still, I liked the idea of Chief Justice Scalia, because he seems a terrible man to waste. Well, one vote is still one vote no matter what the robe.

14 posted on 09/21/2005 5:06:13 PM PDT by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Bush needs to appoint Janice Rogers Brown. The democrats won't be able to hold back playing the race card

Or a Southern White Woman - Karen Williams is the subject of a lot of Washington rumors today. Apparently the President is really considering her.

15 posted on 09/21/2005 5:06:41 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Scalia's been wasted, for the most part.

Chief Justuc Scalia? Sounds about right to me.

Too bad the President didn't have the balls to deal with three hearings instead of two.

16 posted on 09/21/2005 5:08:20 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
Justuc? How about Justice instead.

Please, don;t drink and freep.

17 posted on 09/21/2005 5:09:33 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger

If wishes filled one hand, and BS the other, which fills first? Geesh!


18 posted on 09/21/2005 5:13:26 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

"Chief Justuc Scalia? Sounds about right to me.

Too bad the President didn't have the balls to deal with three hearings instead of two.

I agree, I agree, I agree, and I agree. Did I mention that I agreed?!?

19 posted on 09/21/2005 5:20:13 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
To tell the truth, I am really, really, getting tired of Ann Coulter trashing Pres Bush's selection of John Roberts, first as a SC Justice, and following up with more of the same when he chose Roberts to be Chief Justice. Get over it Ann. You nor anybody else knows how any person selected for a position will turn out. There are probabilities and possibilities. The probability of John Roberts being the best Chief Justice we have ever had is great. The possibility that he will not live up to the expectations of some people is also great. After listening to the protests against John Roberts by super dooper conservatives, I am willing to trust Pres Bush with making the best conservative choice.
20 posted on 09/21/2005 5:36:26 PM PDT by mountainfolk (God bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson