Again, so what?
So what that you're making a distinction without a difference? There's such a thing as reality outside a dictionary. You're treating words as ends in themselves, rather than means to an end. Their purpose is to communicate an idea that actually signifies something.
No, I am making a distinction but somehow failing to communicate it to you. The distinction between design and non-design in otherwise identical circumstances is whether or not the result was intended.
You're treating words as ends in themselves, rather than means to an end.
No, I am trying to make sure you and I mean the same thing by the word design so that we can tell if, as you have asserted, the outcome of an evolutionary process can never be called designed.