I answered the exact question you asked me.
The question was "Does seeding a planet count as design?"
Now you're asking a new question. A design for what? A seeded planet? Sure. A design for the actual organisms that result? No.
So? God or little green men deliberately building an organism that is supposed to evolve is clearly design, and ID, as most ID's luminaries represent it, most particularly the folks who are fond of micro-macro argument, includes just such a scenario. Not that I'm fond of defending the parameters of ID theory, but your take on this question is out of kilter with the common perception of ID theory.