[Elsie]

You can't see the very obvious differences that make the two situations totally incomparable? Do I really need to explain why the analogy is completely bogus and not applicable?

To be able to CHOOSE between a group of given items is a BASIC human function.

How hard it must be for you, entering a restaurant that serves more than one item, and getting something to eat.

[Dimensio]

To be able to CHOOSE between a group of given items is a BASIC human function.

How hard it must be for you, entering a restaurant that serves more than one item, and getting something to eat.

I'm not stupid enough to fall for this. There is a clear and distinct difference between "choosing" one of a number of political candidates and "choosing" a deity to assume exists. If you can't grasp that there is a difference between deciding who amongst a collective of existant entities would best be suited for a particular job and deciding which possibly existing entity our of a collection of possibly existing entities to merely consider in terms of existence, then you lack fundamental reasoning skills and I have to wonder how you even turn on a computer.