Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mama_Bear; DollyCali; dutchess
Back to the screen resolution and the width of our tables for maximum 800 x 600 resolution.

Set at 1024 x 768, my tables are just under 10 inches wide (about 9 7/8ths) - I really don't think I'd like looking at them much narrower! :)

The way I intend to build my tables in future is to make a blank one at the beginning (turned on, turned off) that has a width of 775. That way, I can see how wide I can allow cellpaddings and not make anyone have to scroll if theirs is set at 800 x 600.

209 posted on 09/20/2005 4:01:44 PM PDT by Billie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: Billie
Set at 1024 x 768, my tables are just under 10 inches wide (about 9 7/8ths) - I really don't think I'd like looking at them much narrower! :)

I tried that resolution a little while ago. I could live with it, but I changed it back to what I was running. The width of the tables bothered me a lot for awhile, now it looks normal. :-)

The way I intend to build my tables in future is to make a blank one at the beginning (turned on, turned off) that has a width of 775. That way, I can see how wide I can allow cellpaddings and not make anyone have to scroll if theirs is set at 800 x 600.

That's a good idea. I think I will try that. Easier than my method of upload it all to domania then going to my mother's computer (which has an 800x600 screen resolution) and viewing my post there to see if it is too wide. LOL.

216 posted on 09/20/2005 4:09:52 PM PDT by Mama_Bear (If God brings you to it, He will bring you through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson