Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wash Postie: 'Reasonable' Blacks Believe Levee Plot
NewsMax ^ | 9/18/05 | NewsMax

Posted on 09/18/2005 10:16:23 AM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last
To: ncountylee

I know what is in that water and when I see it pumping out I have to look away or change the ch because I know what they said about the waters and it's coming out dirty from the pumps. Oh yuk!


61 posted on 09/18/2005 11:00:17 AM PDT by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done good more for our country than anyone will know. He's a man of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

How come the whites in St Bernard's Parrish were devastated as well? Hmmmm. Of course, don't mention Gulfport, MS that was blown away is 90% white.

It's no crime to be stupid, but it's not very helpful either.


62 posted on 09/18/2005 11:01:13 AM PDT by playball0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Right. But this begs the question: Why are so many here willing to hear this and run with it with no questions asked?

I sure can't answer that question.

I met quite a few Minnesota Freepers at a picnic last Sunday, and most, if not all, are as distrustful of the media as I am.

As for NewsMax running this story, yes it's disappointing, but much of what they run is disappointing. I've become quite dismissive of anything from NewsMax. They're kind of like an annoying gnat to me anymore. And yes, I know I don't HAVE to read their articles. What's that expression about stopping to watch a train wreck....? LOL

63 posted on 09/18/2005 11:01:46 AM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

"Look, Robinson, anyone who believe this nonsense is neither reasonable nor sober. "

That's about all that needs to be said.


64 posted on 09/18/2005 11:02:37 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"I heard from a very reliable source who saw a 25 foot deep crater under the levee breach."

And what exactly would one expect to find in the dirt under a raging waterfall spewing millions of gallons of water? Daffodils?
65 posted on 09/18/2005 11:02:59 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The qualification for "reasonable" and "sober" has been set way too low.

Soft bigotry of low expectations?


66 posted on 09/18/2005 11:07:25 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The question is do they actually believe it, or, is Robinson talking out of his butt?

Good point. I hadn't considered that possibility.

67 posted on 09/18/2005 11:09:09 AM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This theory is preposterous as it relates to the 17th St canal failure. That failure flooded the whole town.

There were 3 (at least) levee / floodwall breaks. One of the first ones reported was near 9th ward. This is the same area that flooded during Betsy in 1965. I moved to N.O. in 1968 and during the 1970s I spoke with numerous people who sincerely believed the levees were deliberately broken during Betsy to flood the 9th Ward and save the rest of N.O. These were sober white people. I never saw any evidence but a large number of people believed that. Back then many in 9th Ward were white so it wasn't a racial thing but a class thing. So this type of rumor has some deep roots in this area.

If the 17th Street Canal floodwall had not failed many, many people would believe that the levee near the 9th Ward was deliberately broken again. However, this time we have 3 failures (at least) and the 17th Street failure flooded the whole city. For these guys to claim the 17th Street Canal was intentionally broken, of course, is absurd.


68 posted on 09/18/2005 11:10:09 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
A couple of years ago, I was working with an engineer for a major oil company. He was convinced that Iraq was going to be separated into segments, then given to individual companies. For example, Shell would have a part, Exxon another, Chevron another, and so on.

He said this with a perfectly straight face, and honestly believed it.

I was speechless.

69 posted on 09/18/2005 11:10:25 AM PDT by SaveTheChief ("Kittens give Morbo gas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Little_shoe

"I wonder what unreasonable black people are saying."


Maybe - in the Post's view - they're the ones who think it was just the hurricane's fault.


70 posted on 09/18/2005 11:14:04 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
How could that work even if that was the aim of the white racist uberlords? Water seeks its own level and therefore flooding the low-lying areas, presumably mostly black populated, would simply mean the unintentional breach against which this supposed deliberate flooding was aimed would guarantee damage to the white areas since the additional water would rise above the flooded black areas. If anything, to protect the white areas from a natural breach, you would want to keep the low-lying areas dry so they would receive the floodwater while whitey got out of town. Did Robinson ask a single one of these "reasonable" blacks how they thought the alleged plan was supposed to work? What this the WaPo's position on fact checking? Supposedly an editor or two signed off on Robinson having actual "reasonable" black sources and wasn't just pulling this out of his, er, hat.
71 posted on 09/18/2005 11:16:38 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The question is do they actually believe it, or, is Robinson talking out of his butt?

My guess is Robinson found one or two people who said this to him and he went from there. If that. I just can't believe anyone other than Farakhan is stupid enough to really believe something like this. I think the story is nothing but the rantings of a race-baiter gleefully rubbing his hands together trying to seperate black and white yet again. Screw him. People are people. A lot of folks lost everything. Why does it always have to be "us against them" mentality in the press? I'm sick of it.

72 posted on 09/18/2005 11:21:25 AM PDT by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
The battle of New Orleans was fought on January 8, 1815. (Of course, that would be December 27, 1814, by the Julian calendar.)

I'm not aware of the French being defeated at New Orleans. They gave New Orleans and the part of Louisiana west of the Mississippi to Spain in 1763 to compensate Spain for losing Florida to the British. (The British had captured Cuba and Spain traded Florida for Cuba.)

73 posted on 09/18/2005 11:21:38 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
It's more MSM manufacured news. What else is new?

My take on it as well. This is how they get to advance crackpot theories in front of a national audience and still "maintain their journalistic standards." The same tactic they used to keep the "Bush stole Ohio with Diebold's help" story floating for weeks after the election.

And this comes right after one of the Compost's "journalists" has an online chat where he assures us that in his opinion, George Bush isn't really a racist, despite what everyone's saying. I'm still waiting for them to roll out Cindy Sheehan's demand that the military stop "occupying" New Orleans.

This all tells me that the media and the black "leadership" are starting to panic. The President's poll numbers are starting to rebound, and people are starting to realize that while the situation on the Gulf Coast is bad, it's nowhere near the horror show the press and the democrats made it out to be so they could attempt to once again take down George Bush.

But most of all, they got a glimpse of the end of their power in Bush's speech last week, just like they're seeing the lessening of their power in the sight of mostly white relief workers and citizens in the shelter communities helping these black evacuees. Bush was supposed to be shamed into opening the doors to the Treasury and looking away while the Louisiana democrat machine just carted out the loot to spend as it pleased. Instead, Bush promised to help rebuild the area, but with incentives to private charities and interests to do much of the heavy lifting, as well as oversight to ensure that things just didn't revert back to business as usual on megabucks steroids.

Of course, the black "leadership", the Dims and the media just can't have that. They've got to have back their reliable plantation voting bloc, kept ignorant and angry and ready to roll out in the buses on election day for the price of a couple packs of cigarettes or a vial of crack cocaine. There's no way that many of these once reliably democrat-voting people will allow themselves to be used for so cheaply by these self-serving jackals in their $3,000 suits and their chauffeured SUVs once they've been exposed to the America outside of the ghetto, which is exactly what George Bush is "threatening" to do.

This kind of race-baiting and conspiracy mongering, masquerading as "journalism", will only get much, much uglier and vitriolic as time goes by.

74 posted on 09/18/2005 11:21:53 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The flooding is still Bush's fault, for putting Lake Pontchartrain next to New Orleans.


75 posted on 09/18/2005 11:24:32 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC
Why does it always have to be "us against them" mentality in the press? I'm sick of it.

I know you know the answer, but it needs to be said. It has to always be an us against them mentality because it serves the purposes of the liberal agenda. If suddenly there were not class/race/economic groups to pit against each other, their power base would crumble.

susie

76 posted on 09/18/2005 11:24:45 AM PDT by brytlea (All you need as ID to vote in FL is your Costco card...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It must be brain poisoning from the swamp gas. That was left over from white folk sewage drained into the swamp after a plantation party.

Or is the gator pee that causes swamp gas? I hear they are all white meat!


77 posted on 09/18/2005 11:24:53 AM PDT by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors. Don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Do these people not know how to read a topographic map?


78 posted on 09/18/2005 11:30:10 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stbdside
The only people who would believe that have IQs lower than their shoe size.

Bingo!!

79 posted on 09/18/2005 11:30:59 AM PDT by Ima Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
As I compare and contrast this with the impromptu interview by an ABC reporter with Katrina refugees who refused to blame President Bush for anything and rightly placed blame on local officials in Louisiana, I highly doubt Robinson's report.

Here's the interview. Glad to see you back on Free Republic.

http://thepoliticalteen.com/video/abcrey.wmv

80 posted on 09/18/2005 11:33:00 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson