Skip to comments.
Constitutional Amendment on Prices and Wages
Law and Economics Theory ^
| 9/15/2005
| Santiago de la Vega
Posted on 09/15/2005 6:52:20 AM PDT by Santiago de la Vega
Congress shall make no law respecting wages, prices, rents, interest rates, exchange rates or any other exchange rate.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amendment; constitution; exchangerate; interestrate; price; rent; scotus; wage
It's simple and it solves the problem of Federal, State, and Local attempts to meddle with the markets.
They can make an activity illegal, they just can't try to control the price.
To: Santiago de la Vega
I like it, but what does this mean:
exchange rates or any other exchange rate??
Exchange rates or other exchange rates? What about the other exchange rates? Ok, I guess Im wondering why there is a need to say other exchange rates.
2
posted on
09/15/2005 6:56:36 AM PDT
by
Tatze
(I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
To: Santiago de la Vega
They already have an amendment that would accomplish the same thing...the 10th Amendment...maybe we should focus on making Congress abide by that Amendment before trying to pass another one
3
posted on
09/15/2005 6:56:52 AM PDT
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: Santiago de la Vega
Sigh. We've pretty much completed the total inversion of Constitutional interpretation. It used to be that all powers not explicitly granted to the federal government by the Constitution were reserved to the states and the people. Now, the federal government is permitted to do anything it pleases unless the Constitution is amended to prohibit it.
To: Santiago de la Vega
My response on this vanity thread is the same as my response when you posted this properly as a comment on another thread:
Suggested constitutional amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting wages, prices, rents, interest rates, or exchange rates.
If an amendment with that wording were ratified, you can rest assured that the liberals would suddenly discover the difference between "congress" and "state legislatures" and between "congress" and "city councils". Thus, the amendment would not have any bearing on wholesale gasoline price controls in Hawaii nor on rent controls in the Peoples Republics of Kalifornia and New York.
To: Santiago de la Vega
Constitutional amendment? What's that? If passed, will the Supreme Court read it?
sarcasm off.
6
posted on
09/15/2005 8:47:27 AM PDT
by
hripka
(There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
To: Santiago de la Vega
They can make an activity illegal, they just can't try to control the price. Can Congress then ban the payment of interest?? It sure would help the US government from paying out money.
And the moslems would be happy since they don't like interest.
7
posted on
09/15/2005 8:49:52 AM PDT
by
hripka
(There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Of course it can. Thanks to FDR appointed judges everything can be regulated thanks to the brilliant interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
8
posted on
09/15/2005 11:40:29 AM PDT
by
Tarkin
(Janice Rogers Brown to the SCOTUS)
To: Tarkin
It's way past time to rewrite the Commerce Clause.
9
posted on
09/15/2005 12:50:50 PM PDT
by
zendari
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson