Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest

His comment did not address that question, but rather he was addressing the need for an independent judiciary.


7 posted on 09/13/2005 1:07:20 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TheDon
It doesn't matter what question he was addressing. A false statement is a false statement. He said:

"But those rights were empty promises, because that system did not have an independent judiciary to uphold the rule of law and enforce those rights."

That is false. The lack of an independent judiciary was not the reason why those rights were empty promises.

8 posted on 09/13/2005 1:14:52 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson