Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveMcKing
You've just reiterated your original statement and added more insults. That is not a rational arguement.

You still need to support your position. You haven't, because you can't. You just keep repeating your flawed premise.

an engaged individual would only remain independent for such reasons as I have stated.

"Only"? Prove it. Give evidence, examples, and facts.

I seriously doubt you can because your assertion is false and indefensible.

120 posted on 09/11/2005 12:39:53 PM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: pillbox_girl
I seriously doubt you can because your assertion is false and indefensible.

No, your assertions are false and indefensible. You have not supported your position, most likely because you can't. You just keep stating the same falsehoods repeatedly.

Don't be irrational - cite data, illustrations, and circumstances.

121 posted on 09/11/2005 12:45:40 PM PDT by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: pillbox_girl
Hmmm...seems to me an independent is someone that likes to smoke dope and own a firearm...
125 posted on 09/11/2005 12:57:34 PM PDT by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson