Replies

"Being a post 2000 freeper you wouldn't understand what a gem this site was in 98 and 99. It was an object of awe."

I lurked long before I signed on and I have to agree with you that FreeRepublic has gathered some 'kooks'. And yes, it was an excellent site and still is IMO.

That does not mean that newer Freepers are less patriotic or concerned about the issues regarding the shredding of the Constitution and our rights than those who signed up prior to 2000!

I would think that a patriot, such as you, would be happy that we have enlisted the support of new, younger conservative thinkers. Just because a Freeper joined past 2000 also does not guarantee that they are young "new conservatives". I am 54 years old and have been very conservative both politically and in how I have lived my life.

Your blanket description of post 2000 Freepers is dead wrong and I strongly suggest that you issue an apology to those goof folks that you offended when you described them as "...they don't have a CLUE what the constitution is and readily support ignoring and trashing it when it suits their means."

That statement is totally wrong.

Your blanket description of post 2000 Freepers is dead wrong and I strongly suggest that you issue an apology to those goof folks that you offended when you described them as "...they don't have a CLUE what the constitution is and readily support ignoring and trashing it when it suits their means."

It is spot on and if you know the framework enunciated in the Constitution it is obvious they don't know anything about it. Furthermore they cannot see the danger of a government that ignores it. That is the most baffling part. When these same excesses are meted out by someone like Hillary they will squeal like stuck pigs.