Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker; Mo1; Howlin; All
Yesterday the New York Times editorial board wrote a fire-breathing editorial that for almost 24 hours ranked as the "most-discussed story" on Technorati and the "most e-mailed article" on nytimes.com. The board wrote that "George W. Bush gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday." Instead of "consolation and wisdom," the President offered "a long laundry list of pounds of ice, generators and blankets delivered to the stricken Gulf Coast." The board went on to offer a long laundry list of angry accusations. The editorial board doubted that Bush "understood the depth of the current crisis" — unlike the wizened board, which had been following the crisis on CNN.

The editorial built up to this penultimate paragraph:

While our attention must now be on the Gulf Coast's most immediate needs, the nation will soon ask why New Orleans's levees remained so inadequate. Publications from the local newspaper to National Geographic have fulminated about the bad state of flood protection in this beloved city, which is below sea level. Why were developers permitted to destroy wetlands and barrier islands that could have held back the hurricane's surge? Why was Congress, before it wandered off to vacation, engaged in slashing the budget for correcting some of the gaping holes in the area's flood protection?

Good question. Maybe because Congress listened to the NY Times editorial board in April of 2005:

Anyone who cares about responsible budgeting and the health of America's rivers and wetlands should pay attention to a bill now before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. The bill would shovel $17 billion at the Army Corps of Engineers for flood control and other water-related projects — this at a time when President Bush is asking for major cuts in Medicaid and other important domestic programs. Among these projects is a $2.7 billion boondoggle on the Mississippi River that has twice flunked inspection by the National Academy of Sciences... [snip]

This is a bad piece of legislation.

Lesson: Don't listen to the NY Times editorial board. (via Don Luskin)

http://media.nationalreview.com/

1,346 posted on 09/02/2005 7:01:16 PM PDT by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1305 | View Replies ]


To: hipaatwo

Are ya watching Gretta's show now??

Thank You Gretta for the uplifting stories about the refugees and not the doom and gloom stories like others in the media

They just interviews one women that is staying at a shelter ... she said that when they were in NO they didn't know if anyone cared about them and now she knows there are a whole lot of good people that care about them and how grateful she is for all this help


1,685 posted on 09/02/2005 7:57:42 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1346 | View Replies ]

To: hipaatwo

2,128 posted on 09/02/2005 9:10:50 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1346 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson