Posted on 08/31/2005 7:32:03 PM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
"I seem to remember hearing that the Indian tribal name Algonquin means "Eaters of men"."
No, it means fish-spearing-place.
You are a victim of the Zinn school of revisionism and lies. Moreover you sound like a pulp history freshman.
Hope this helps clarify what I think of your hysteric historic propaganda.
Then it was already overpopulated.
You have swallowed whole the popular version of PC history.
Try reading Maddens'a article here for an accurate portrayal of Spain and the inquisition
http://www.crisismagazine.com/october2003/madden.htm
As for Serbia and the Mooslems - this might help awake you from your stupor
http://www.srpska-mreza.com/History/pre-wwOne/Bosnia-tyrannized.html
The rest of your drivel is beneath contempt...the realization that history is written more than ocasssionally by those who political/religious/ideological axes to grind might help you with a more objective reading of history in the future.
IIRC, the tomahawk was introduced by the British traders
Charming.
Bizarrely biased.
From the encyclopedia link in the link you posted on Kosovo:
"Kosovo is the term deeply embedded in the Serbian national consciousness - it draws from the 1389 Serbian defeat by the Turks. "
Kosovo Polje is the "field of blackbirds" as they call the place where the Serbian army was destroyed.
"Some Serbian nobles and peasants converted to Islam in order to reap privileges by serving the foreign oppressor. Their offspring are today's Bosnian Muslims."
So, as I'm reading you, the Kosovars don't have any right to be there. The fact that they are descendents of Serbs who converted to Islam seems to matter not at all to you. That is how the Serbs see it, anyway. Racial traitors, they call the Kosovars. I said both sides committed atrocities, I meant it. Some of my knowledge of the subject comes from reading, some from classes I've taken, and some from people who worked with me whom I sent to Sarajevo and Tuzla, in the mid-1990's. "You have swallowed whole the popular version of PC history." No, I've learned from a multitude of sources that history is never simple. You've swallowed the whole "Islam is evil" thing, yourself. Islam is a bunch of people. Some are good. Some are bad. Some are variable. Try reading a little more history yourself. Christians are the same way.
"The term "tomahawk" is a derivation of the Algonquian words "tamahak" or "tamahakan" "
This is a source?
Try this:
"TOMAHAWK. The fighting axe of the North American Indians. Originally, these weapons had stone heads and short wooden handles. The stone heads gave place to iron ones shortly after the coming of the whites. Tomahawks generally have narrow hatchet blades, frequently backed by a pipe bowl. The handles are of wood, and hollow, forming the pipestems. They are of two main types, those procured from the English were of much simpler forms than those of French make. They were used in throwing as well as striking. Fig. 794.
Page 621
A Glossary of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor in All Countries and in All Times.
George Cameron Stone. Copyright 1934, 1961.
I notice you didn't say anything about scalping...
ping list ping
Do you not think Europeans are just as likely to commit atrocities as Indians? Oh come now to deny the brutal massacres that took place during the reformation, Christians killing christians in the name of christ, on both sides or the inquisition is such foolishness. There are two extremes here. Im not saying the indians are innocent, but Europe tends to do the same things under the guise of "Civilization".
Then came Whitey.....
with their smallpox infested blankets.
Ping
Must have been another tribe. Pretty sure I read that. I know I've read first person reports of cannibalism among the Indians in Colonial times.
There was some cannibalism, yes.
Among N. American Indians, it was not generally for meat and sustenance, but for ceremonial and symbolic reasons, to take a bite of one's brave, vanquished foe both to exult in the victory by rending his flesh, but also to take into yourself a degree of his spirit. This was not universal, and it varied by tribe. The Ottawa at one point within historical memory were cannibalistic. The Chippewa were not. When the Ottawa moved into lands alongside their Chippewa cousins, they abandoned the practice.
North America is big, and had a lot of tribes and nations. To speak of the Indians in general by speaking of a specific subset is to speak of London and Dublin by giving details of Sarajevo.
Myth.
There is exactly one case where this may have occurred. And in that case, it is not clear if it was done intentionally. And that instance involved a British officer, prior to the American Revolution.
America gets a lot of criticism for wiping out Indians through disease and biological warfare. It wasn't us. It wasn't the United States of America. And most likely it wasn't anyone at all, at least as far as a deliberate policy was involved.
It's all just a myth created to make White people look bad.
Many people really believe the small pox blanket story, and I never miss an opportunity to point out that it's a lie. I'm glad you already knew it to be false.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.