But did she setup the wall, or modify it somehow, making it less useful.
By definition, a wall is a BARRIER. And it was ANTI-useful to U.S. national security. While protective of the "liberties" of our foreign enemies who merely happened to already be on our shores.
posted on 09/03/2005 4:23:11 PM PDT
by Paul Ross
(Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
To: Paul Ross
Yes - a wall is a barrier - so?
I think you missed my point - which was:
If we complain Gorelick setup a wall, the Left will weasel out of it by demonstrating that the wall was already there.
Our complaint must be accurate. If what she did was shutdown a door in the wall, or change the affect of a door, or make a wall higher, then that's what we must point out.
Yes - obviously - regardless of which she did, it hurts us. But we improve our chances of getting others to hear our complaint if it is accurate.
posted on 09/03/2005 5:25:22 PM PDT
(To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson