Posted on 08/23/2005 5:08:09 PM PDT by wagglebee
The difference is that one is offered as an opinion whereas the other is issued as an edict, or marching orders. Is that too nuanced for you to grasp?
*Chavez*
Chavez is like a spoiled child craving attention. He wouldn't make a pimple on Uncle Sam's butt.
You have a gang leader in your city who makes a pact with a gang leader in another city to disrupt the legitimate merchants doing business in your city. They pressure the legitimate businesses to make compromises that are in the gang leaders best interest and the legitimate merchants and their customers worst interest. By making a pact with the gang leader in the other city, they can cohesively bring done the execution of legitimate business.
Both gang leaders are mass murderers and tyrants who are trying to tear down the practices of free thinking individuals.
Hope this helps!
Hate is hate. Preach it hard and often enough, who knows what seeds will be sown.
So when Clinton uses dozens of cruise missiles to try to "take out" the people involved in an assasination attempt against a former US president, he's hailed as a hero, but when some conservative religious figure that the leftists love to hate merely suggest that we might want to "take out" someone who's actively acting against the US and the safety of its citizens, he's roundly condemned. Go figure.
I heard it today. One of the first times in a long time I was able to tune in.
I was wondering why Fox & Friends thought this was "news" - after hearing him today, I "got" it.
In March of 2003, Bush ordered a missile strike on a house where it was believed that Saddam Hussein might have been staying, I don't recall anyone who has an opinion I respect condemning that.
I love cliché arguments, they convince how smart you are and I must give up immediately. So you win, I lose, and as long as I love you we will get along just fine.
Just in 24 hours they ( MSM ) jump all over the Pat Robertson controversy, but, they have had almost a month to report about Able Danger, and we probably won't hear about Able Danger until congress has hearings about it, and then, only then will the MSM reluctantly report on it, and spin it as they wish, yup, no liberal bias here.
Robertson = death of one person
Imam = death of everyone not muslim
Got it?
Even if our military and government did have plans to do that, they won't tell the MSM until after the fact, or not at all.
What is the percentage of Muslims there?
Actually, that's pretty funny.
For the record, I can't stand him because of his African interests. Anybody interested can check out the business interests he and Jesse Jackson have (not together) regarding diamonds and African dictators.
GO PAT, GO!!!
Islamofascists want to convert the entire world to the Muslim faith. To accomplish that goal Islamofascists want to kill everyone who stands in their way.
Hugo Chavez is a psychotic dictator and is extremely hostile to US interests. We ignore Chavez at our own peril. Leaders in that region like Chavez and Castro are enemies of America. Chavez has funded Al-Qaeda and Castro has moved Cuba's biological program from Cuba to Venezuela.
The law that makes assassination of foreign leaders should be overturned, immediately. So when the time comes, we can take out this nutcase, immediately.
The Iman is using hundreds of young men as human bombs; Pat Robertson is one man stating an opinion. Do you take 'Onward, Christian Soldiers' literally?
Not to mention the Chinese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.