Actually it is the most pathetic in a while. Before anyone knew how severe the explosion was or wasn't, before anyone knew if people were killed or injured, they were rushing to pop off jokes, lacking any self-control, who are lucky that it wasn't worse lest they be immortalized as immature total a-holes. The first reaction of most normal person to a headline of an explosion in a large city is concern and shock, not wisecraccks, especially after 9/11. And spare me the total bullcrap copout line of resorting to humor to deal with grief. Not applicable in the first moments of what could be a terror act.
Compare this thread to one of the first 9/11 threads, where the only joke on the first page was #41, despite no confirming images of the severity until post #28, and no report of the 2nd plane until #46.
Starkly shows the difference between FR in 2001 and 2005.
I've got an idear. Get. Over. It.
Well spoken.
Yup, big difference.
Experienced FReepers can smell a serious thread. It was obvious from the get-go this was no 9/11. But if you enjoy your high-horse, keep riding.
I thought the Dems had a lock on being offended, but I guess we have our share too. If the jokes offend you maybe you should not be on this thread.
I agree. It's being reported from several news agency's at least one woman was transported to a burn center in San Francisco.
I see nothing funny here.
Yes, indeed and thanks for drawing the contrast graphically.
Heavens... that 911 thread brought back all sorts of memories of that morning...