[kidkosmic1]

Ah, debate tactics 101.

No, if YOU find fault with Behe's work because of your own research and observations, lets have it.

I'll give you a graceful out--you're up on your Stephen Jay Gould, yes? Where did the man see problems with Darwin's theories? What completely unprovable theories did he devise?

Run over to TalkOrigins if need be. We'll wait....

[Dimensio]

No, if YOU find fault with Behe's work because of your own research and observations, lets have it.

Ah, so criticisms are only valid if the person putting them forth is the one who authored them.

By that standard, just about any criticism of evolution presented here on FR is rendered moot, because most people pushing forth the criticisms didn't author them originally.

I'll give you a graceful out--you're up on your Stephen Jay Gould, yes? Where did the man see problems with Darwin's theories?

Gould disagreed with gradualism, at least universal gradualism.

What completely unprovable theories did he devise?

All theories are, by definition, unprovable, so any theories that Gould put forth are unprovable.