Or should I say ZOT!
Cindy's looking for an answer to why we are in Iraq because the reason that G.W.Bush keeps giving the American public keeps changing.
First,it was the story about Iraq being a nuclear threat and having weapons of mass distruction.
Then everyone kept alluding to the 9/11 attack. (Those guys were mostly Saudis who trained in Afganistan under Bin Laden. We still have not found Bin Laden...short memory on some people's part)
Then it was the war to liberate Iraq, or the war of Iraqui freedon.
That didn't work and the story became the War against terror.
No wonder she wants answers for why her son died.I can't figure out why we are really there either. Which of the above is it or is it really something else?
TROLL
Gee, you need to go back & read the Iraq War Resolution, and you'll find the only thing that's truly changed is that Saddam is no longer in power in Iraq. Welcome "newbie". Enjoy your stay!
Get lost.
I ask you; since we have not found Bin Laden, does that mean he doesn't exist?
Along the same train of thought...even though we have not yet found the weapons of mass distruction...could they not in fact exist?
While I'm at it...it was first the "War on Terror" and part of it was Operation Iraqi Freedom. You have your time line reversed and your logic ain't nothing to brag about either.
can we ZOT? I haven't got to do that yet...
Begone, troll.
The whole world thought Saddam had WMD..NOT JUST GW. Doesn't matter anyway..he would have gotten them and he was scum.
We don't have BL yet..so what? Have some faith.
We have been in a war against terror (Islamofacists) for more than twenty years..where have you been? They kill and bomb everything in site. Did you hear about Bangladesh this week?..I didn't think so.
We are freeing Iraqi's while creating hope for Americans..are you simply unable to get the big picture or are you just lazy..TROLL.
Why don't you sing us a little I love Saddam song...
Momomom.."I love Saddam..lalalala..You were a good man...lalalala..I's ok that you kill at the drop of a hat, I don't like Bush..and that is that."
Put some ice on it!
Her son was a hero who made his own choice to enlist. Cindy on the other hand, is a useless piece of trash. I am well past having any sympathy for her. I'm sure her family wishes the roles were reversed and Casey was still here and she was the one gone. I know I do.
Check the resolution that all your buddies voted for authorizing us to invade Iraq. It list all those and more. It is the Democrats and the MSM who keep changing Bush's reason for going to war.
WRONG! It was about the UN Resolutions that Saddam refused to comply with. Does your heart not care about those brave men and women who lost their lives during Desert Storm? That war ended because Saddam AGREED to comply with the UN Resolutions. Should their deaths be in vain? It was until the U.S. and its Allies made Saddam accountable for the fact that he refused to comply. How many of our planes were shot at? Do you care?
Yes, those other reasons were important as well. But what started this war was Saddam's failure to comply with UN Resolutions. Don't you forget it.
I'm so sorry that you're liberal and stupid. Does it hurt?
Let us say an arrogant spoiled brat, who seems unable to understand that 2+2 = 4 keeps demanding an explanation for it.
First I explain by taking two toy cars and adding two more toy cars and count the total, four.
He doesn't get it.
Then I explain by taking two toy ducks and adding two more toy ducks and count the total, four.
He doesn't get it.
Four years later, I am trying to use ring and group theory...and he doesn't get it.
The boy is then quite proud of himself for demanding answers, and is more convinced then ever that 2+2 can't possibly be 4 because I kept changing my story.
You can't figure it out troll? Probably because you are so stupid. If you don't understand national defense then you can't understand anything. Just read up on Able Danger and maybe it will sink in. Liberals like you with your sorts of brain dead reasoning got 3000 of us slaughtered ON OUR OWN SOIL and if not taken out of power would have gotten thousands more killed no doubt. Sadam Hussein was paying for suicide bombers and training terrorists. But then that's reality. I don't expect YOU to get it.
Or should I say ZOT!
Oh really? If your reason no. 3 (liberating Iraq) wasn't stated before we went into Iraq, why was the war dubbed "Operation Iraqi Freedom"?
The answer, of course, is that the President repeatedly cited several reasons which justified invading Iraq, including WMD.
Your position is extremely dishonest. The media and leftists such as yourself like to throw around the notion that the WMD we went after never existed, and they base it on Kay's report.
The problem you have with that, of course, is that the "no WMD" line was taken out of context of the Kay report, which also stated there was evidence the WMD was transported to Syria just before we invaded.
The Kay report also said Saddam was more dangerous that we even thought.
Kay also reported the underground prison at which Saddam was using prisoners as guinea pigs to test biological weapons. And of course, there were the vials of botulinum toxin, brucea, and congo fever which were discovered in the bathroom of one of Saddam's scientists.
Your side's solution to the Saddam problem was to "contain" him by sending UN inspectors to "find the WMD." Saddam's plan, again as stated in Kay's report, was to wait until he got the all clear from the UN inspectors and then go into production of more WMD in earnest. Thank God your side lost that argument.
As to possible connections between Saddam and Al Qaeda, they've been established. In the '90s that connection was reported by the mainstream media extensively and the 9/11 commission is on record agreeing with Cheney's statement that while the evidence of a direct connection between hte 9/11 attacks themselves and Saddam is not credible evidence (note it was stated as not credible evidence as opposed to no evidence at all), there was credible evidence of a link between Saddam and the group Al Qaeda.
You are searching for answers in the dark my friend!
Look where the light is!
You can kill them and anyone who keeps putting them there,Or you can abandon your kitchen.
My guess from your post,Is that you'd be cooking in your bathroom.......for a little while anyways,Until the snakes show up there.
So there is only one way to deal with them.
Hunt them down and kill them.
It ain't rocket science,But I'm amazed at the number of absolutely clueless people out there.