To: airborne
I refined my Google search for the words Cindy Sheehan plus Iraq (e.g., search within "Cindy Sheehan" for "Iraq") and Natalie Healy plus Iraq. The result:
Cindy Sheehan - 1,200,000 hits
Natalie Healy - 33 hits
We have a situation where two mothers lost a son in Iraq; one supports the war, one doesn't. The symmetry ends there. The story should be "Exhibit 'A'" in media bias.
To: Steve_Seattle
Good comparison, and a good example. More comparisons come to mind, some dealing with class, others dealing with honor and duty. Sheehan comes up much shorter on those than she does on Google hits.
31 posted on
08/17/2005 3:04:56 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: Steve_Seattle
"Natalie Healy - 33 hits"Thanks for the info. I am now going through the Google hits one by one and opening them. The least we can do is to help keep the woman from slipping off the front page immediately.
38 posted on
08/17/2005 3:23:49 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: Steve_Seattle
1.2 million for Cindy vs 33 for Natalie Healy. I don't know what bias your talking about. Why that's simply a ratio of 36,363 to 1. MSM's call that 'balance'. </sarc>
53 posted on
08/17/2005 4:22:34 PM PDT by
6SJ7
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson