Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeeOhGee; ex-snook; Willie Green
According to the same source, the unemployment rate stayed at 5.0% (a terrific rate in anyone's book). So if 207,000 jobs were added, a proportional amount of jobs were lost. A wash.

Not true (the "wash" part). Why? There are other metrics regarding "employment." I'll give you two: Farm payrolls and self employment. Those stats don't show in the 5.0%. And to top it off, many economists believe there is a "core" unemployment rate that is static. Estimates are between 2-4%. Those in this metric will never get a job, or will never be counted on a payroll.

5.56mm

70 posted on 08/13/2005 1:36:25 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: M Kehoe

Would farm payrolls and self-employment show in the 207,000 jobs created? I'm not being difficult, just trying to get a handle on the numbers.


86 posted on 08/13/2005 1:54:48 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson