Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 Staff Members - Who Are They?
Action ^ | 8/13/2005 | Stocksthatgoup

Posted on 08/13/2005 3:20:58 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Peach

I'm beginning to wonder how enmeshed Tom Kean is/was in the political and corrupt nightmare that is New Jersey politics.

Who knows how many staffers on the Republican side were equally committed to a whitewash job? Not because they're in cahoots with corrupt Dems, but because they are all creatures of Washington politics and know that whistleblowers never become Senators, Reps, or Presidents.

My cynicism just keeps growing. :-( Time to go visit Brother Cadfael....

Pinz


61 posted on 08/15/2005 6:58:14 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: All

Can somebody flowchart the connections of these people?

At least to Gorlick and company?


62 posted on 08/15/2005 7:03:30 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
MacEachin's university major was economics, but he also showed great interest in philosophy. His Agency career--like Gates'--included an extended assignment to a policymaking office. He came away from this experience with new insights on what constitutes "value-added" intelligence usable by policymakers. Subsequently, as CIA's senior manager on arms control issues, he dealt regularly with a cadre of tough-minded policy officials who let him know in blunt terms what worked as effective policy support and what did not.

By the time MacEachin became DDI in 1993, Gates's policy of DDI front-office pre-publication review of nearly all DI analytical studies had been discontinued. MacEachin took a different approach; he read--mostly on weekends--and reflected on numerous already-published DI analytical papers. He did not like what he found. In his words, roughly a third of the papers meant to assist the policymaking process had no discernible argumentation to bolster the credibility of intelligence judgments, and another third suffered from flawed argumentation. This experience, along with pressures on CIA for better analytic performance in the wake of alleged "intelligence failures" concerning Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, prompted his decision to launch a major new effort to raise analytical standards.

Psychology of Intelligence Analysis
63 posted on 08/16/2005 12:39:03 AM PDT by Freedom is eternally right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JaneAustin
MacEachin can't be all bad if Ray McGovern doesn't like him:
That’s for sure. As for the fall of the Soviet Union, we did miss that. The main reason was the fellow in charge of Soviet analysis was named Doug MacEachin, and guess what he’s doing now. He’s one of the most important staffers on the 9/11 commission.

Ray McGovern interview
64 posted on 08/16/2005 12:43:39 AM PDT by Freedom is eternally right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

bttt


65 posted on 08/16/2005 12:49:05 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Testimony of Christopher Kojm at Congressional hearings on 911 (pdf file in picture format so if you want the synopsis he was testifying about the TIPOFF program at the Department of State having info about two of the hijackers on August 23, but it was after working hours , so the info wasn't entered into the computer until the next day. One had arrived in the US in January of 2001, the other arrived in July.)
Christopher Kojm Testimony
66 posted on 08/16/2005 1:08:16 AM PDT by Freedom is eternally right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JaneAustin

Thanks for the info.


67 posted on 08/16/2005 1:13:42 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
Thanks for this. I'll be working on it for the next day or so.

I'll get back to you with my results.

L

68 posted on 08/16/2005 1:18:08 AM PDT by Lurker (" Many are already stating that the decision in Kelo renders the contract null and void." I agree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory; backhoe
Just an AMAZING THREAD!

longtermmemmory is right..we DO need a flowchart...detailed...pages if necessary....the connections to ..oh gag me...tax free so called non-partisan groups (that all seem to be hillary knee padders) is AMAZING!

Myself...I am very interested in learning if staffer Elinore Hartz, widow of WTC travesty, was ever informed of Able Danger's findings. Out of all the staffers for the commission, SHE is the one whose antenne should have gone BONKERS at Able Danger's info on ATTA ad the cell.

Most of these staffers are well acquainted with the law and have connections to the various agencies involved...she does not.

I would love to know if all information requested by the staffers was first vetted by a certain group from within the staff...their names...and IF there is an archive of the materials they did NOT SHARE with the 9-11 commission members.

69 posted on 08/17/2005 1:21:38 PM PDT by Republic (Our Father in Heaven touched the Pope, who KNEW of Terri, Terri got her mass, VATICAN STYLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
He also is calling for 9/11 Staffers to be questioned under oath

I can save Weldon the trouble. All answers to key questions will be "I don't recall."

70 posted on 08/17/2005 1:25:05 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Just an AMAZING THREAD! longtermmemmory is right..we DO need a flowchart...

A flow chart would be a great help- honestly, my head spins when I try to follow the tangled skein of interconnections amongst all these shady groups of exploiters and plunderers.

71 posted on 08/17/2005 1:27:39 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
To: FReethesheeples
My comment: "He also is calling for 9/11 Staffers to be questioned under oath."

Your comment: "I can save Weldon the trouble. All answers to key questions will be "I don't recall.""

You may well be correct, but they might well be found in contempt of Congress, for whatever that is worth.

Later, they will likely be in contempt of Court, if they don't "refresh" their memories and provide any requested documentation as well. (In which case they can potentially be found to be "obstructing justice" or the like.)
72 posted on 08/17/2005 2:40:15 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Was the Narcissistic Joe Wilson a Source in "Outing" His Own Wife Valerie Plame as a "CIA Agent"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson