[wagglebee]

Felzenberg says, "Well, yeah, you know, lots of stuff was coming in over the transom, lots of stuff was flying around. At the end of the day when you're writing a report, you have to take facts presented to you." Well, they ignored this fact and chose not to use it because it didn't mesh with what they already had -- and, you know, folks, I don't know how much of this you remember. This 9/11 Commission thing, this was one of the many assaults in the spring of 2004 that was designed as an attack on the Bush reelection effort. Make no mistake about this.

I just hope like hell that this doesn't just "go away" like all of the other Klintoon scandals have.

[JediForce]

Agreed....sadly...Fox is focused on Aruba...

Refresh my memory...

Did terrorists take down some tall buildings and the defense headquarters of Aruba or something? Killing 3000 people and sending Aruba-in troops to war on many fronts?


PAGING ROGER AILES....PAGING ROGER AILES....WAKE THE #&%# UP!

This vent was brought to you by Ovaltine.

[popdonnelly]

I feel there's a betrayal of the public here, because the 9/11 Committee was intended to find out what went wrong and to suggest how to correct it. When it leaves out fundamental facts, such as that Atta and three of his colleagues were identified in 1999, then the whole thing appears to be a farce.

[japaneseghost]

Now let me get this straight. Gorelik, who was and might still be on the CIA payroll, didn't believe a uniformed military intel officer.

Doesn't the CIA and US MI work together? What kind of CIA official doesn't believe a uniformed MI officer? (HINT HINT NUDGE NUDGE)

This stinks of a cover-up, and the US military is making sure that they don't become part of it. Bravo.

This will all get swept under the rug, blown off, until the NEXT evil terrorist event on US soil.

Let's just watch and see how fast Curt Weldon gets turned into a 'crazy.'

[feedback doctor]

All this is why Gorelick was on the commission, and why Sandy Berger looked like had taken viagra before leaving the National Archives. Since the 9/11 commission was commissioned by congress to find out the truth, those in the Clinton Admin who did not bring this up (bet Clinton himself knew of the order to not share the Atta info with the FBI) when before the commission are guilty of a crime. And the commission by refusing to take the info that was given to them is also guilty.

[Marine_Uncle]

Ping

[feedback doctor]

Found this is CNN's web site in a story about this:

---

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/08/11/sept.11.hijackers.ap/index.html

"Staff members now are searching documents in the National Archives to look for notes from the meeting in Afghanistan and any other possible references to Atta and Able Danger, Felzenberg said."

---

Now what do we know about the NATIONAL ARCHIVES? Who has been there? Gitmo is too good for Berger.

[Eagles6]

bttt

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks for the post. Execellant. The issue will not go away, Representative Weldon, as steam gathers other responsible republican leaders won't let it fall under the scope, neither will Rush, Hannity and others. Hopefully it will slowly become such a big stink that the L/MSM will not be able to control the outcome by way of not reporting it. Since Janet Reno ran the DoJ, she must be implicated in any irregularities as well as Jamie Gorelick, should things gravitate to a level where the former DoJ should be investigated by the current DoJ. Guess the DIA and FBI will not have anything to worry on this one. They where just following orders. That is: don't communicate, it's against the law. Of course we know this is a bunch of bull in many ways. I wonder how many times in a normal day someone from one agency calls someone from another agency for info on some particular case. If that was not the case, then why would the DIA even have been investigating Atta? I don't mean to generate conversation on this just thought some may find it interesting. Atta had nothing to do with typical concerns the DIA would want to know about. He was an individual, with no military contacts. Other then known ties to people in the Iraq Intel Organization, etc.. Then again, maybe I just answered my own question.

[OnRightOnLeftCoast]

Sometime ago in the past I saw a reference to the fact Hitlary made it a point to get Jamie (Al) Gorelick on the commission. I'm still looking for it.

It will not suprise me, after all, "Gorelick wasn't some flunky in the Justice Department. She had been selected for the job by Hillary Clinton and had assumed the role held by Webster Hubbell before he was forced from his position to face Whitewater-related charges that landed him in prison. Gorelick, like Hubbell before her, essentially ran the Justice Department because of the gross incompetence of Attorney General Janet Reno." (from June 2005 WorldNet Daily).

Connect the dots to Hitlary. Would it mean goodbye 2008 for her?

[zeaal]

Be great to hear from the actual folks that served on the Able Danger Group.

[FReethesheeples]

Gorelick was the quintessential "Fox in the Hen-house" or "Perpetrator perfectly positioned for covering up the investigation of events & major scandals in which she was materially involved."

[SerpentDove]

I wonder what Rush is going to say about this today.

[Blogger]

Rush is excellent today.