Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody
It was not a pool that belonged to a 'resort' as the article implies. It was private property.

Now you confuse me: most "resorts" ARE private properties. In fact, I don't know any resort in this country that is owned by a government.

223 posted on 08/12/2005 6:53:38 AM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: ExitPurgamentum
Now you confuse me: most "resorts" ARE private properties.

Okay, let me clarify. It was a pool that belonged to a homeowner's association. To use the pool, you had to be a homeowner, or an invited guest of same. And every homeowner's association has rules as to when and how many guests can use the pool, and may also require that they be accompanied by a homeowner.

In other words, if a private owner 'leased' their home to this crowd, it is unlikely that the rights to use the pool went along with the lease. A renter is not a 'guest' of the homeowner.

250 posted on 08/12/2005 2:13:03 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson