To: MEGoody
The something fishy is that the property is not a resort but a bunch of condos. The owners of some lease their units out through leasing agents, not Baytree. The other units are occupied by residents as in a residential neighborhood. The shock of 117 new party animals into the neighborhood may have prompted more than a few complaints from the existing residents. Baytree settled after winning the initial court decision ( I am assuming this because the family filed an appeal
here ) probably to avoid further mischaracterizations in the press.
To: RGSpincich
The something fishy is that the property is not a resort but a bunch of condos.Then it's too bad they had to settle. They have the right to lock down the pool to keep more than 100 'guests' from overwhelming the facility.
213 posted on
08/12/2005 6:43:42 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: RGSpincich
The shock of 117 new party animals into the neighborhood may have prompted more than a few complaints from the existing residents. The way to deal with that is to pass a bylaw limiting the size of parties that may rent the facilities. If there were no such bylaws, you let the party go through and then amend your bylaws.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson