Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh: Clinton Administration's Gorelick Wall
Prevented Arrest of Mohammed Atta
RushLimbaugh.com ^
| 8/10/05
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 08/10/2005 6:11:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
You cannot erase a simple fact, and that is that Jamie Gorelick, the author of the wall preventing the sharing of such information was a commissioner on this panel and that right there might provide some staffers a roadblock to imparting that information. I think that Gorelick should be investigated and if possible charged with obstruction.
1
posted on
08/10/2005 6:11:58 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
2
posted on
08/10/2005 6:16:36 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
To: wagglebee
Michael Savage did his entire show on this topic tonight. I know Weldon is on it, but is there anyone else on our side of the aisle calling for investigations into this?
3
posted on
08/10/2005 6:18:05 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: oceanview
Savage also claimed that "Hush" wouldn't cover this.
4
posted on
08/10/2005 6:25:34 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
To: wagglebee
Sandy Burger pants are burning. That is one thing for sure.
5
posted on
08/10/2005 6:29:28 PM PDT
by
rod1
To: wagglebee
So now we know how they were able to so quickly and accurately identify Atta and some of the others. They were already under investigation.
To: wagglebee
Will we see the 9/11 widows on with perky Katie Couric demanding to know why the Clinton Admin allowed this to happen. Why of course we WON'T see that happening.
7
posted on
08/10/2005 6:32:16 PM PDT
by
feedback doctor
(Going to war might mean terrorism, NOT going to war means slavery and death)
To: philman_36
I always wondered how they knew so much about Atta within hours of the WTC attacks.
8
posted on
08/10/2005 6:33:25 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Could it be that it was documents related to this issue that Burger was hiding his pants?
9
posted on
08/10/2005 6:36:00 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Mesocons for Rice '08)
To: wagglebee
10
posted on
08/10/2005 6:39:43 PM PDT
by
philo
(They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist. . . . Union General John Sedgwick last words)
To: philo
11
posted on
08/10/2005 6:47:50 PM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: philo
I AM so mad over this that I want heads to roll from our government cancer. This is so outrageous that everyone who is involved preventing what needed to be done needs to fired and arrested for treason. There is no excuse in the world that will defend these traitors.
To: wagglebee
IMO Gorelick was placed on the 911 Commission deliberately to hide this information.
Tha actual information is old news it was all discussed by Freepers during the Commissions hearings and no one would listen. The Media was too busy trying to blame 911 on Bush.
To: wagglebee
Weldon is saying defense officials told the people they talked to, the staff members of the 9/11 Commission, who conducted a lot of the interviews, "We told them all about Able Danger, we told them all about Mohammed Atta, we told them we had this, we told them we could not share the information, we were told not to share the information with anybody at the FBI because they were here legally or the wall that existed."
The 9/11 commission KNEW about this. Yet there was not a peep about Able Danger in the 9/11 commission report. Gorelick, Hamilton, and Ben Veniste made sure they covered up for Bill Clinton. They turned the 9/11 commission into another Clinton coverup.
14
posted on
08/10/2005 6:56:27 PM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: thebaron512
I am 100% with you. This is a cancer to freedom.
To: sgtbono2002
There is no doubt in my mind that Gorelick's purpose was to run interference for the Clintonista's and conceal their incompetence and culpability.
16
posted on
08/10/2005 6:59:05 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Mike Darancette
"Could it be that it was documents related to this issue that Burger was hiding his pants?"
And how many of those documents that were hidden in his undapants wound up in the shredder?
17
posted on
08/10/2005 7:00:41 PM PDT
by
Burf
To: wagglebee
We were in the car headed over the hill to Hoopa and I stopped at a vista point so we could listen to this before we lost the signal. He said it was because Clinton didn't want to add to the bad PR of Waco!!!
18
posted on
08/10/2005 7:06:05 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: wagglebee
I believe you are right.
I am so outraged over this I am actually going to sit back and wait until I can think rationally before posting a diatribe...too angry to even spew. FURIOUS!
19
posted on
08/10/2005 7:09:48 PM PDT
by
Republic
(Our Father in Heaven touched the Pope, who KNEW of Terri, Terri got her mass, VATICAN STYLE!)
To: Burf
If Burger was out to clean up Clinton's legacy then Clinton must have set Burger out to get the documents out of the National Archives. This is a scandal that could unhinge Hitlary's effort towards the 2008 Presidential Elections. This theft of archival documents tops the Watergate scandal.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson