Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where is OUR (Canada's) Leadership? ... Peter Worthington
Toronto Sun via www.canoe.ca ^ | August 8, 2005 | Peter Worthington

Posted on 08/08/2005 9:30:38 PM PDT by NorthOf45

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: longtermmemmory

They do, but they'll do more besides.


21 posted on 08/09/2005 9:14:24 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

"We have men there embedded with U.S. troops..."

I did not know that. I have learned my first thing for today. Thank you for enlightening me.


22 posted on 08/09/2005 9:15:15 AM PDT by Owl558 (Pwease pardan my speling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
Britain...is prepared to amend its Human Rights Act to get rid of terror advocates who threaten freedom, stability, security. The U.S. has a problem this way, handcuffed by the free speech terms of its Constitution.

Interesting to see that even conservative Canadians view Free Speech as "handcuffing". Try speaking out against homosexuality in Canada, Mr. Worthington - you'll then be the one who is handcuffed.

23 posted on 08/09/2005 9:16:52 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45
We can't even get rid of al-Qaida supporters who advocate suicide bombings against decent democracies, of which Canada is one.

I guess the author felt that it was necessary to remind the readers that, yes indeed, Canada IS a democracy.

24 posted on 08/09/2005 9:22:36 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

He has. Peter is a good man and a damn good writer. I've met him personally. Also, as I said before on other threads, conservative Canadians and British are different than American conservatives. Many are Burkean and Hobbesean conservatives as much as Lockean. There are improtant differences. Regardless, we still value free speech highly in practice and theory.

The belief of free speech here that might be confusing you is a close adherence and preference to a social custom of civility, and military custom of silence. i.e. a combination of, if you have nothing nice to say, keep your mouth shut (even if you have the right to do otherwise) and loose lips sink ships (and talking can still be grounds for sedition and treason).

It pretty much goes back to Tories and Whigs and the Revolution of 1648.


25 posted on 08/09/2005 9:26:33 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NorthOf45

If you have a Peter Worthington ping list started, would you add me to it? Thanks! Ryle (in the West)


26 posted on 08/09/2005 10:30:15 AM PDT by Ryle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson