Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada
EagleForum.org ^ | July 13, 2005 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 08/01/2005 8:53:07 AM PDT by tyw

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: tyw

Ludicrous. Never going to work, but some CFR thinkers must figure that if we don't pull the rest of the hemisphere up with us, the barbarians will be at the gates. They can't say this publicly, of course, so just ram this stuff through without a by your word from the US taxpayer and pretend we're too stupid to know what's going on. Does anyone think Mexico or any other country in the hemisphere would do the same for us if the shoe was on the other foot? Uh, no.


21 posted on 08/01/2005 12:47:18 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
As an aside, note Pat Robertson, televangalist supreme. In 1991 he wrote a book called "The New World Order," in which the corrupting influence of the CFR is a major theme. Since then, he's been somehow coopted; he's dumped almost all the investments of his "religious" organizations and corporations into communist China, and mutters nary a peep about the CFR

I liked the part about how Jimma Carter got nominated. Just shows one how the presidents are just puppets to the elites who run this country.

22 posted on 08/01/2005 1:09:11 PM PDT by Digger (Outsource CONgr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
Maybe you should consider the fact that the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a government agency and has nothing to do with the Bush administration.

It has all to do with each & every administration.

23 posted on 08/01/2005 1:10:54 PM PDT by Digger (Outsource CONgr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer


24 posted on 08/01/2005 10:06:41 PM PDT by Coleus ("Woe unto him that call evil good and good evil"-- Isaiah 5:20-21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.


25 posted on 08/01/2005 10:08:54 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
No the CFR, isn't an government agency per se, it is a tax exempt NGO that follows the United Nations model of "civil governance". It subverts the idea of representative govnerment by composing legislation to promote its agenda of hemispheric integration and global government and presents it its numerous affiliates in Congress to be made into law. The people whom our government is supposed to represent, are cut out of the loop.
26 posted on 08/01/2005 10:18:01 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

It's a lobbying group with lots of money that tries to influence Congress.

It does not control Congress, unless Congress allows itself to be controlled.

The people elect Congress, and have the option of not reelecting Congressmen. They are not cut out of the loop, though many if not most are poorly informed.

They utilize the biased media and their large sums of money to distort people's view of the world through half-truths, and outright lies to push an agenda.

They however still need the support of the American people in order to push their agenda forward. While they often attempt to achieve that support through rather transparant deception, they receive an appalling amount of support from the American people.

None of this however is justification for calling Bush a domestic enemy and suggesting he should be impeached over the comments of this group.


27 posted on 08/02/2005 4:47:04 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
None of this however is justification for calling Bush a domestic enemy and suggesting he should be impeached over the comments of this group.

Who said this?
28 posted on 08/02/2005 7:23:19 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

"Who said this?"

TWY in post #1, which was to whom I originally responded.


29 posted on 08/02/2005 7:53:26 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson