Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Truth About Hillary" Book Review
The New York Times ^ | 7/31/05 | Joe Queenan

Posted on 07/29/2005 11:51:09 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland

'The Truth About Hillary': Many a Dubious Revelation

Printer-Friendly

By JOE QUEENAN Published: July 31, 2005 TEN years ago, Kevin Costner's career took a turn for the worse when he made a hugely expensive film called ''Waterworld.'' Since then, the film has become synonymous with megalomania, hubris and all the other fancy words that journalists like to use when things fall apart and the center will not hold. But unlike his other movies ''Wyatt Earp'' and ''The Postman,'' which are really bad, ''Waterworld'' is simply a dumb, expensive dud, not an epic, studio-imploding disaster on the order of ''Heaven's Gate'' or ''Battlefield Earth.'' If you are in the market for a truly horrendous movie, one of the worst motion pictures ever made, you are going to be cruelly disappointed. ''Waterworld'' stinks, but it does not reek

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bookreview; edklein; hillaryclinton; newyorktimes; truthabouthillary
The caption on the web site is "sleaziest political book ever?". Well I guess if your writing about one of the sleaziest politicians ever, your going to write a sleazy book.
1 posted on 07/29/2005 11:51:09 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

I hope Joe feels better after passing that.


2 posted on 07/29/2005 11:59:11 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland
"At some level, Hillary Clinton feels most comfortable in the company of fat people"

This is news?

3 posted on 07/30/2005 12:09:38 AM PDT by Dr.Hilarious ("My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity."-Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

Queenan thinks he's writing ironically, but it makes a lot more sense if you read it straight. Hillary is sleazy, or worse, and Klein captures her accurately. For people like Hillary, the truth is inevitably a smear.


4 posted on 07/30/2005 12:15:35 AM PDT by AZLiberty (French: The language of diplomacy, except for the French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

"Mrs. Clinton herself has long battled a tendency to beef up, but in perhaps the most astonishing revelation in the book, ''several of her Wellesley College classmates, who played sports with Hillary, described how she looked in a T-shirt and shorts,'' and according to them, ''she had a tiny waist, slim legs and ankles, and small buttocks.'' "

The reviewer writes a patently dishonest review taking things out of their context to attempt to make Klein's book look ludicrious. While Klein's book may not be the greatest piece of prose ever written and indeed has certain sleazy aspects to it, there are many aspects of the book that make it an interesting read--and an important cautionary tale about a terribly damaged and an emotionally unhealthy person who wants to become president.

However the hatchet job done by this New York Slimes review doesn't even attempt to deal with the book on its merits or in anything but a smarmy and sarcastic fashion. I could take that if it wasn't for the deliberate dishonesty and misrepresentation of the contents by the reviewer. The above situation about observations regarding Hillary's figure while at Wellsley is but one example. Klein makes mention of the above not to say as this New York Slimes reviewer claims that Hillary is pandering to fat people. Klein never intimates any such thing. And if this Slimes reviewer honestly came away with that interpretation, then he's a terribly intellectually-stunted person.

Klein mentions the above about Hillary's college physique in discussing that she may be suffering from a disease that has caused her to gain weight in her lower extremities, the exact name of which escapes me at the moment. This is not a central focus of Klein's book nor a foremost revelation in it. Indeed it consumes one short paragraph.

That this idiot Clinton shill reviewer chooses to focus on that to the exclusion of more pertinent and damaging revelations, and does so out of context, shows his intellectual dishonesty. I notice he ignores the more weighty charges against Hillary in this book to focus on what he can make look the most petty and irrelevent, even if it happens to take up less than a paragraph of the book.

I wonder if this same Slimes reviewer showed so much incredulity about Kitty Kelly's slander piece on the Bush family. I'm guessing not.


5 posted on 07/30/2005 12:16:59 AM PDT by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Now thats a fair and honest review....Thanks MikeA


6 posted on 07/30/2005 12:50:24 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (Allah, is not... Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

I liked "The Postman". Other than that I don't know what else this writer is saying because I don't feel like going through the trouble of registering or going to bugmenot.com just to read a Slimes article.


7 posted on 07/30/2005 12:53:14 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

This is an Amazon review of the book Joe Queenan wrote:

When I first read Joe Queenan, I thought he was about the funniest writer on the planet. He is still very funny and very talented, but his shtick can get just a bit old, and fast.

This book started as an article, and if you can, I would track that article down and save yourself the money and the time it takes to read this very slim yet somehow plodding hatchet job on anything popular for Middle America.

This subject was stinging and hilarious as an article, running the perfect length and not overstaying its venomous welcome.

But as the book drags on, Queenan is so relentless with his targets that the reader feels a backlash coming. Sometimes it seems like the mere mention of "Tony Orlando" or "Phil Collins" is supposed to be enough to make you laugh and understand how disgruntled Queenan is. And simply the word "suck" is used and used again to describe everything Queenan doesn't like. Okay, Joe, we get it. It's a bit tired to read page after page of insulting "middle American huckleberries", etc. I guess if people are not as fortunate, intelligent, or rich as Queenan, they're more or less despicable cretins to be mocked by the admitted "cultural effete".

Another problem is that many of Queenan's references are either already outdated or beyond obvious. The entertainment industry does the job for him when cheap targets like Steve Guttenberg or Joe Piscopo are chewed up and spit out by the industry itself once it has no use for them. The vast majority of figures like this really do wind up just going away, and why? Because the audiences--the middle Americans Queenan loves ripping to make himself sound smarter--disgard their product. Queenan's biggest problem is with crap that poses as art, and he even admits that certain cheese is not so bad, as long as it's aware that it's cheese (as he discovers that Manilow is a good entertainer, if a cheeseball). However, I did find it a bit nauseating when our intrepid author, who has immersed himself in popular culture and become addicted, needs to take a trip to France to cleanse himself and rediscover real beauty and culture. Can you say vomit?


8 posted on 07/30/2005 2:12:47 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Pray for America like its future depended on it, because it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland
The lesbian rumors, the suspicion that the Clintons have not used the Ozzie-and-Harriet template in customizing their marriage, the belief that Hillary Clinton will do anything to advance her career are all twice-told tales.

So let me understand this: the truth about the Commodities Scam Queen should only be told once, and in one way; while the lies should be recycled day after day and week after week. Did anyone suggest that it was a "twice-told tale" when some acolyte wrote about her (faux) compassion for the children and the downtrodden?

ML/NJ

9 posted on 07/30/2005 5:28:25 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland


Joe Queenan
10 posted on 07/30/2005 5:34:23 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

Another on of Clinton's winged monkeys who's jealous that no one buys his books...


Queenan Country : A Reluctant Anglophile's Pilgrimage to the Mother Country (Hardcover)
by Joe Queenan

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #80,840 in Books


Balsamic Dreams : A Short But Self-Important History of the Baby Boomer Generation (Paperback)
by Joe Queenan

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #189,752 in Books


Red Lobster, White Trash, & the Blue Lagoon : Joe Queenan's America (Paperback)
by Joe Queenan

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #287,235 in Books


11 posted on 07/30/2005 5:41:54 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
While Klein's book ... indeed has certain sleazy aspects to it ...

Agreed, but if any sleeze is attributable to Klein's treatment, rather than that which is inherent to discussing Senator Clinton, I didn't catch it.

Klein mentions the above about Hillary's college physique in discussing that she may be suffering from a disease that has caused her to gain weight in her lower extremities, the exact name of which escapes me at the moment.

Chronic Lymph-edema.

12 posted on 07/30/2005 5:51:48 AM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

"... a terribly damaged and an emotionally unhealthy person who wants to become president."


I believe this is why they are circling the wagons to protect Hillary, and trying to destroy Klein in the process.


13 posted on 07/30/2005 9:52:46 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Very good. You should send this to the Slimes


14 posted on 07/30/2005 10:18:09 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

The last time I saw a review this obscenely opposed to it's subject, was when "The Passion" came out.


15 posted on 07/30/2005 10:28:57 PM PDT by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland; Smartass; Boazo; devolve; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; potlatch; ntnychik

16 posted on 07/30/2005 10:34:42 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

LOl Phil, you need to have two red eyes glowing through those blue sunglasses!


17 posted on 07/30/2005 10:37:19 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson