To: BenLurkin
Actually, it is not a gaffe. Any ethical judge should be willing to step out of any case, if he/she encountered a flat-out conflict between what the law requires and what his/her church required. I'll bet the sentence after that, which is not being reported, was, "Based on my experience, I do not anticipate such a conflict occurring in the future; it has not occurred in the past."
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "South Pacific" Lesson about Muslims
13 posted on
07/26/2005 12:44:17 PM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
To: Congressman Billybob
"a flat-out conflict between what the law requires and what his/her church required."
Hard to imagine what that would be . . . but if there are laws on the books which violate Christian principals then we definitely need Christian judges to go ahead and set things straight.
16 posted on
07/26/2005 12:46:50 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Congressman Billybob
I'll bet the sentence after that, which is not being reported Very possible .. the Dems do have a habit of not reporting a FULL quote
41 posted on
07/26/2005 7:52:05 PM PDT by
Mo1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson