Posted on 07/25/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by Alex Marko
No doubt. ....But it'll be so much easier and more satisfying for them to blame their downfall on one lone Colorado congressman than take a good, long look in the mirror.
So let me get this straight, killing 3,000 innocent people in NY and threatening constantly to do it again, only more so, is OK.
The mere thought of retaliation in kind is horrible?
Tell me what threat to the those without conscience is acceptable?
Hesitation to advocate such an act is understandable, but mentioning the possibility is human.
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no crime".
Leonard Pitts is about as far left as you can go. Always has been. He is an apologist on so many levels and issues that it has become impossible to keep track of them all.
What in the world does the editiorial writer think will be the response of America if we are hit with a nuclear bomb? It won't be pretty I assure you...Tancredo is a pretty good guy...If we had listened to him and enforced our immigration laws,911 wouldn't have happened. BTW, wasn't the Miami Herald one of those that championed the starvation death of Terri Schiavo?...What a bunch of "yahoos" they are....
I think the "evil twin" theory is Tancredo's only hope.
The author thinks that the perpetrators should be given a time out and deprived of their allowance.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1450292/posts.
If someone -- anyone -- listens to him now, the odds of another 9/11 or worse would be greatly diminished...
Instead, millions of illegals have swarmed in (bypassing that window-dressing security at airports), and met with minimal resistance from the Bush Administration "Homeland Security" since 9/11.
Some "security" and WoT, eh?
We're sitting ducks.
""Tancredo is the worst thing to hit the GOP in a long while. He will just hurt the GOP in 08.""
Since 1992
No Pitts is a democrat overseer who would be in the same position when Islamic law is imposed.
All you have to do in FR these days is search for Tancredo, and then see who posted an article about him. 99% of the time, the article is negative - and posted by a QUISLING.
Likewise, any QUISLINGS on FR at the time will come running.
I don't like to talk about nuking someone just becasie we can.
However, The bad guys have been threatening for years to set off a nuclear bomb otr two or three in this country. The Muslim world is sitting back cheering them on.
Tancredo just put another option on the table for the extremists and so called moderate Muslims to think about. If you think it is not already on the shelf somewhere, think again.
This YAHOO is worried about world wide condemnation from Russia, Turkey and the Muslim world. If this senario is ever carried out there will probably be two or three gaping holñes, glowing in the dark, where American cities used to be. Screw em.
Ignorance is an excuse. Sometimes.
Deliberate misrepresentation is fraud, pure and simple.
Someone persuade me that a straight lie of ommission is inconsequential.
It does not take a rocket scientist to see what is wrong with the introductory paragraph.
"""They were speaking about a multiple city, multiple device attack. I guarantee you that in this type of a case, a submarine would nuke Mecca.""
Youre dreaming....I am willing to bet that there would be no retaliation before I'd bet on bombing mecca
Alex, your beer is getting warm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.