Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts Too Extreme For The U.S Supreme Court (Bill Press MEGA-BARF Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 07/22/05 | Bill Press

Posted on 07/22/2005 12:06:17 AM PDT by goldstategop

For weeks, Democratic leaders in the Senate practically begged Bush to avoid another Armageddon over judicial appointments. Consult with us the same way Clinton used to consult with Senate Republicans, they advised him. Appoint a woman. Pick someone in the tradition of Sandra Day O'Connor: a true conservative, but not an ideologue.

But Bush ended up stiffing Democrats on the court the same way he stiffed them on Social Security. Never responded to the names of acceptable conservatives they sent to the White House. Ignored their advice – even his wife's! – to name another woman. Appointed a white male instead, one who promises to be, not another Sandra Day O'Connor, but another Antonin Scalia or Clarence Thomas: an extreme right-wing zealot.

No doubt Roberts is a bright, qualified lawyer with extensive experience, both in private practice and government, including 39 cases argued before the Supreme Court. The problem is not his judicial qualifications, but his political ideology. His track record as deputy solicitor general and as member of the D.C. Court of Appeals for only two years proves how far out of step he is with mainstream America.

In 1990, as Ken Starr's deputy in the solicitor general's office, Roberts appeared before the Supreme Court to support legislation banning clinics that received federal funds from providing advice on abortion. Even though this was a limited-funding issue, Roberts tried to turn the case into a direct assault on Roe v. Wade. "We continue to believe," he told the court, "that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overturned." No matter what conservatives say, that is not the position of most Americans. In the latest ABC News poll, 68 percent of Americans said that Roe v. Wade should remain untouched, the law of the land. Roberts is in the extreme minority.

On an important church-state issue, Roberts argued for the first Bush administration that formal prayer should be permitted at public high-school commencements. If students didn't like it, said Roberts, they could simply stay away from their own graduation. In another First Amendment case, Roberts argued that flag-burning was unconstitutional. Both positions were rejected by the Supreme Court. You know he's an extremist when even the Rehnquist court finds him too conservative.

As junior jurist on the D.C. appeals bench, Roberts' record is equally out of the mainstream. He was one of only two members to dissent from a court ruling upholding the constitutionality of the Endangered Species Act (so much for environmental protection). And he recently gave his OK to the Bush administration's plan to try suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay in top-secret military tribunals, without basic due-process protections guaranteed by international law.

Perhaps most troubling of all about Roberts's record is a little-known case involving a young girl and a single French fry. It happened on the Washington subway system, where eating and drinking are prohibited. A 12-year-old was spotted on the subway eating a French fry. She was arrested, handcuffed, frog-marched off to police headquarters, finger-printed and detained for three hours until her mother arrived to pick her up. The outraged mother filed suit against the Metro. The court ruled for the mother, but Roberts sided with the city – a frightening insight into his lack of regard for individual rights and his excessive tolerance for the abuses of Big Brother.

Granted, Roberts doesn't have a long paper trail (which is why Bush picked him). In many ways, he's a "stealth candidate." But he has enough of a paper trail for us to know he's a member of the extreme right on economic and social issues. Which is why James Dobson, Tony Perkins and Pat Robertson are so ecstatic over his nomination.

The scariest part is: John Roberts is not only wrong on the issues, he's only 50 years old, which means that, if he's confirmed, he'll be in a position to undermine our civil liberties for the next 30 years or more.

We know what this is all about. George W. Bush wants to get Karl Rove off the front pages in the worst possible way. And he did so, by nominating John Roberts on the Supreme Court. But Democrats in the Senate can't let that happen. They must derail this train before it leaves the station.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: billpress; extremism; johnroberts; liberals; megabarf; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Bill Press wants the Democrats to filibuster Roberts on ideological grounds. He's a conservative and therefore an extremist out of step with the mainstream of the country. Never mind his outstanding qualifications. He has the wrong beliefs and to liberals that puts him on the wrong side of being a fine jurist. Never mind the Left lost three elections in a row. Bill Press has the arrogance to demand the President name a judge acceptable to him. Some of these liberal losers still don'r get it. That's why this missive rates a mega barf. Its enough to churn one's stomach.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
1 posted on 07/22/2005 12:06:19 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bill Press = Steaming turd.


2 posted on 07/22/2005 12:08:01 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Talk Nerdy To Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yeah, but did you really expect better than this from Bill Press?


3 posted on 07/22/2005 12:11:20 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Anything that Bill Press writes deserves it's own special barf alert.


4 posted on 07/22/2005 12:11:58 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Whop-bobaloobop a WHOP BAM BOOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Amen !


5 posted on 07/22/2005 12:14:39 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bill Press writing for Worldnetdaily!!!


6 posted on 07/22/2005 12:15:26 AM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
...frog-marched off to police headquarters...

Second time I have seen this phrase and they make it sound sooo fun.
7 posted on 07/22/2005 12:18:26 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Umm, Mr. Press? I know that facts aren't something that editorials are necessarily strong on, but just to take a couple issues into consideration...

First - Roberts was on the Senate Democrats acceptable list. Senator Lieberman let the cat out of the bag, admitting that he was on the acceptable list... Hmm. Actually, once I bring this up, all that is really left is to note that Roberts won the case for the government.

Oh, and Bill? ROVE! ROVE! ROVE! He's gonna getcha!
8 posted on 07/22/2005 12:23:36 AM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carumba

Maybe Bill Press can give us some facts to back up that scurrilous charge of "frog-marching Roberts right into jail". I've had root canals that were more sensational than Bill Press.


9 posted on 07/22/2005 12:24:02 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is a form of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Has anyone asked why the lefties have such an unhealthy obsession with "frog-marching"?


10 posted on 07/22/2005 12:25:52 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia
I've noticed he bears a striking resemblance to Dennis Prager - or is that Hugh Hewitt? I guess there's a liberal alter ego somewhere. Just don't get the looks confused. LOL!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
11 posted on 07/22/2005 12:26:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Either Bill Pissy-fit has been straight reading DUh,or they've already gotten their talking points,because this article reads almost exactly like a thread over there.


12 posted on 07/22/2005 12:29:08 AM PDT by mrsmel (Off to delouse after peeping on the 'Rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

Either they are queers or steers.


13 posted on 07/22/2005 12:29:13 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
From the article:

We know what this is all about. George W. Bush wants to get Karl Rove off the front pages in the worst possible way. And he did so, by nominating John Roberts on the Supreme Court. But Democrats in the Senate can't let that happen. They must derail this train before it leaves the station.

Poor Bill... He forgot that 2006 is an election year for Nelson and Nelson, and both that Democratic Senators ARE NOT GOING TO COMMIT POLITICAL SUICIDE.

Poor Bill... He forgot that Susan Collins of Maine (Republican turn-coat at times) -- was informed that the largest base in Maine was added to the base closings list (on the day that the Roberts nomination was announced -- just to make a point with Susan to "play ball). This is a double humiliation for her -- she is on the Senate Armed Services Committee -- so if she cannot keep the base open, she also committs political suicide.

Then there are other RED STATE Democratic Senators that do not want to walk the plank like Tommy did in South Dakota...

Poor Bill -- he just doesn't understand that if the Democrats lose 7 seats in the Senate in the next election, Northeast Republicans will not even be able to aid them...

14 posted on 07/22/2005 12:31:24 AM PDT by topher (God bless our troops and protect them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
Bill Press wrote a book listing Ten Reasons Why President Bush Must Go! last year. Since the voters didn't buy them, what makes him think he's qualified to give a President he thought didn't deserve re-election advice on a judicial nomination? The Democrats need to sit down and shut up. We won and they lost. Its that simple.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
15 posted on 07/22/2005 12:32:13 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bill Press Is a screaming Loon who should be placed in a mental hospital and fed raw fish sticks till he explodes.
16 posted on 07/22/2005 12:34:18 AM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Re: "Bill Press = Steaming turd."

That hits it right on the head... Well, so to speak of in this matter.

The math seems right to me, too!

17 posted on 07/22/2005 12:37:07 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: topher
Poor Bill... He forgot that Susan Collins of Maine (Republican turn-coat at times) -- was informed that the largest base in Maine was added to the base closings list (on the day that the Roberts nomination was announced -- just to make a point with Susan to "play ball). This is a double humiliation for her -- she is on the Senate Armed Services Committee -- so if she cannot keep the base open, she also committs political suicide.

I don't know why but this makes me want to laugh my head off(BWAAAHAAAHAA!!!)maybe because it's fun to see RINOs get a reminder of who brung 'em to the dance.
18 posted on 07/22/2005 12:37:37 AM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The very idea that Dems would send the names of a couple of "acceptable conservatives" for SCOTUS to the President is very strange.


19 posted on 07/22/2005 12:41:24 AM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Pick someone in the tradition of Sandra Day O'Connor: a true conservative, but not an ideologue.

<sarcasm>Yeah, Sandra's a true conservative. Affirmative action has always been a Republican value... after all minorities can't get into college on their own merits... </sarcasm>
20 posted on 07/22/2005 12:45:35 AM PDT by Saint Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson