Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Tried to Discredit Secret Memo Through Washington Post
Jeff Gannon - A Voice of the New Media ^ | 7/18/2005 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 07/18/2005 5:56:59 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: ConservativeMajority
Plame’s specialty was weapons of mass destruction proliferation, yet little of the information the agency possessed turned out to be accurate in terms of Iraq.

Here's another conspiracy theory:

Could it have been, that Plame, working within the CIA during the lead-up to the war in Iraq, was part of a conspiracy in the CIA to supply erroneous information on WMD, knowing full well, that not finding the WMD's once we were in Iraq, would greatly discredit the President? It now seems quite plausible.

41 posted on 07/18/2005 6:39:09 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
....the role of the CIA officials in the Plame affair is the subject of an internal investigation. Some of those involved in the operation to undermine the administration have already been reassigned or forced to resign.

Clearly, Plame was part of the element within the CIA that actively worked against the Bush administration. The available evidence shows that it is likely she suggested her husband for the mission so that the agency would be assured of the anti-Bush results.

WOW!!!
This further explains why Miller refuses to testify that Plame was her "source".

42 posted on 07/18/2005 6:39:13 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

Then how do we explain the statements of Clinton, Kerry, Daschle, etc. who all said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs in the last 1990s?


43 posted on 07/18/2005 6:41:02 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
I still would like to know WHO of Plame's Superiors AUTHORIZED Wilson's junket to Africa.
It is probably the same person who hired Craig Livingstone.
44 posted on 07/18/2005 6:41:29 PM PDT by Burf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
Responsibility for the intelligence failures that culminated in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 lies squarely on the shoulders of the CIA. It had become dysfunctional and highly politicized by the end of the 1990s as the result of budget cuts and neglect. The extent to which it was a rogue agency is demonstrated by its attempt to influence the outcome of last year’s presidential election.

Jeff Gannon is an incredibly lucid and interesting writer. It is no wonder the dying socialist "mainstream" press went after him the way they did.

45 posted on 07/18/2005 6:41:38 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

I know a lot of us were worried about CIA leaks leading up to and since the War in Iraq started....but I certainly didn't expect it to go this far...

What does Porter Goss do? Everyone is asking Bush if he will keep Rove even if there were no laws broken, if he "just lied"?

Maybe the media should be asking Goss what he will do about Plame-Wilson, even if SHE didn't break the law, can he trust her to continue in Bush's term....after all Joe Wilson is out talking not just about this supposed "outing",

but he is slamming Bush about going into Iraq at all. Therfore, we know he is still crying about the political aspect of going to war---and his wife is of like mind.


Maybe the Bush people need to turn the mics around and ask the CIA if they think it would be better to put Plame on "leave" until this is over, considering what we already know about her husband's lies.


46 posted on 07/18/2005 6:41:50 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: calex59
On the radio just now they said that Spector was summoned to the WH to discuss a nominee. Maybe this Santorum employee statement confirms that there has been an agreement of one.

So sorry for no specifics. You really have to watch what questions you ask in there. It is very easy to get the ear. Meaning, they will take your press pass from you if you push on certain issues. Timing is everything and this was not the proper time to bring up the question of "who".

47 posted on 07/18/2005 6:42:19 PM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority

So many possibilities, twist and turns. Just caught a Minute or two of Isakoff on H&C though I was busy putting my baby girl to bed. I thought I heard him say the prosecutor said this was about a criminal retaliation on a whistle blower. Did anyone else catch it? Are reporter allowed in the Grand Jury?


48 posted on 07/18/2005 6:43:10 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
Then how do we explain the statements of Clinton, Kerry, Daschle, etc. who all said that Saddam Hussein had WMDs in the last 1990s?

First: They all pretty much recanted that position during the 2004 Election.

Second: As I said, it is plausible and just a theory.

49 posted on 07/18/2005 6:44:09 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

She was on leave for a year and only recently returned to Langley.


50 posted on 07/18/2005 6:44:53 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: carumba
I think a lot of the reporter rancor is over the lady in jail. They feel it is unjust for her to be in jail when others aren't.

She'd be out just by answering questions before a grand jury that is bound to secrecy.

In the alternative, I can live with jailing the other reporters so she has company <g>

51 posted on 07/18/2005 6:45:41 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

Bingo! I think your theory has merit and would make total sense.


52 posted on 07/18/2005 6:47:42 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority

If anyone was reading a newspaper during 2003-2004, it was a fact that liberals in the intelligence community were trying to damage the President, his foreign policy AND his re-election.

No wonder Porter Goss did a house cleaning when he got in there last September. Don't ya'll remember the whining from the press about it. Yea, their leakers got the ax.


53 posted on 07/18/2005 6:48:34 PM PDT by nightowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archon of the East

I think the Whistleblower Protection Act would be as difficult to prosecute as the 1982 statute for exposing a covert agent. It is supposed to protect those who are go public with evidence of criminal activity. Wilson doesn't even come close with his flawed report. The SIC discredited him and his report.


54 posted on 07/18/2005 6:49:29 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority

Rush nailed it today. He said the MSM sees this story as one where they think they can earn-back their credibility.

It is also payback for the Time/Koran story where the press thinks the Administration snookered them.


55 posted on 07/18/2005 6:49:50 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Rush mentioned today that 36 media organizations filed a 'Friends-of-the-Court; paper, stating that, since no law was broken, the reporters should not be forced to reveal their sources or go to jail.

This thing gets weirder on a daily basis.

The liberal left must be hiding something big!

56 posted on 07/18/2005 6:51:14 PM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
Clearly, Plame, was part of the element within the CIA that actively worked against the Bush administration.

Responsibility for the intelligence failures that culminated in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 lies squarely on the shoulders of the CIA.

57 posted on 07/18/2005 6:51:14 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

if your going to listen to air america...you should wear condoms in your ears like I do


58 posted on 07/18/2005 6:52:28 PM PDT by adversarial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority; All
Clearly, Plame was part of the element within the CIA that actively worked against the Bush administration.

Also known as the "CIA Insurgency".

59 posted on 07/18/2005 6:53:33 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
She was on leave for a year and only recently returned to Langley.

Plame declines to answer any questions about her work at the CIA. She also says she won't talk about the scandal that has periodically gripped Washington since her cover as an employee in the Directorate of Operations at the Agency was blown two years ago. What she will say about her life is that “things have been busy—I have five-year-old twins.” She just returned to work at the CIA last month, her husband says, after an eight-month unpaid leave taken at her own request. She goes out to Langley five days a week, he says, but only part-time.

Is that about the same time Porter Goss took over?

60 posted on 07/18/2005 6:54:25 PM PDT by tapatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson