Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
So the idea is that, since SUVs are pretty much uesless for older people, the SUV as such is doomed to extinction.

No. People will always have children. They will always have home improvement projects and groceries and rugrats. Until, that is, they grow older.

And then? Well, their children will buy the SUVs.

17 posted on 07/17/2005 1:36:12 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reactionary

I'm 67 and don't have any kids to haul around and i'm not giving up my pickup, I wouldn't drive one of the tin cans they sell today if I was paid to. With the tools I carry i'm 5,100# empty, don't get in my way or i'll flatten you.


128 posted on 07/17/2005 3:21:50 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Reactionary

SUV's should have been named VIAD's (Vehicles for Insecure, Arrogant Dorks)


134 posted on 07/17/2005 3:24:58 PM PDT by mindspy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson