Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thunderclouds in China ... A Storm is Brewing ...
self | 15 June, 2005 | joanie-f

Posted on 07/15/2005 10:29:12 AM PDT by joanie-f

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2005 10:29:12 AM PDT by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Badray; tet68; FBD; BraveMan; EternalVigilance; Lurker; Noumenon; Squantos; ...

FYI


2 posted on 07/15/2005 10:31:55 AM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
That's one long vanity!

BTW, your facts about EMP are not true. If they were, our space bursts in the 50's and 60's would have wiped out Hawaii, and instead they just screwed up AM radio for a few minutes.
3 posted on 07/15/2005 10:33:34 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

For later


4 posted on 07/15/2005 10:34:26 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Liberalism and islam are terminal.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Hey when simple nearby lightning bolt can knock out PCs we know that an EMP will put a complete halt to civilization as we know it. Lightning only 1/4 mile away wrecks havoc on today's LAN (local area network) wiring and in-turn the PC damage from there in. As the circuitry gets faster it gets denser and smaller and even more susceptable to EMP damage.


We will not be able to buy gas or buy groceries, etc because everything has a chip in it.


5 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:03 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldleft; joanie-f
your facts about EMP are not true.

Take it up with all of the respected people she has quoted, and the report of the congressional commission.

Awesome research Joanie. Just awesome! Thanks much for the ping!

6 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:16 AM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oldleft

"If they were, our space bursts in the 50's and 60's would have wiped out Hawaii, and instead they just screwed up AM radio for a few minutes."

Hawaii had tube type electronics in that day. The semiconductor of the last 20 years are 1000 times more susceptable to damage from EMPs.


7 posted on 07/15/2005 10:37:20 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Nuclear subs are immune to EMP. Immune.


8 posted on 07/15/2005 10:38:23 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Very thorough research, joanie--thanks for the good work.


9 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:17 AM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Hey when simple nearby lightning bolt can knock out PCs we know that an EMP will put a complete halt to civilization as we know it. Lightning only 1/4 mile away wrecks havoc on today's LAN (local area network) wiring and in-turn the PC damage from there in. As the circuitry gets faster it gets denser and smaller and even more susceptable to EMP damage.

You got that right. And all of the people who are claiming that EMP won't cause the damage that it will, and that the informed ones are "chicken littles" are too blind to see the writing on the wall. It's a major threat that could leave us pretty defenseless.

10 posted on 07/15/2005 10:40:02 AM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
BINGO:

IMO, the lack of focus on the EMP scenario is one of our leadership’s most deadly oversights.

11 posted on 07/15/2005 10:41:41 AM PDT by GOPJ (Phil Donahue "has made the world safe for emotion masquerading as thought."-BOZELL III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Nuclear subs are immune to EMP.

Have you read the congressional report? AND if nuclear subs being immune are all you're concerned about you're pretty short sighted.

12 posted on 07/15/2005 10:42:25 AM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

I agree China is a very, very serious threat.

I'll bookmark for later reading.


13 posted on 07/15/2005 10:42:31 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; King Prout

ping


14 posted on 07/15/2005 10:43:46 AM PDT by GOPJ (Phil Donahue "has made the world safe for emotion masquerading as thought."-BOZELL III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; All
Knowledge is power . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
15 posted on 07/15/2005 10:44:09 AM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Nice work Joanie, interesting how much danger we face
TODAY because of the actions of just TWO democrat Presidents.


16 posted on 07/15/2005 10:44:46 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; dennisw; watchin; VOA; timestax; xJones; justshutupandtakeit; TopDog2; ThomasMore; ...

ping


17 posted on 07/15/2005 10:44:50 AM PDT by GOPJ (Phil Donahue "has made the world safe for emotion masquerading as thought."-BOZELL III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

bump


18 posted on 07/15/2005 10:44:56 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

Our strategy has to be based on immediate response.

An EMF attack isn't going to affect subs off the coast of China, and the Chinese need to know that any nuclear attack will result in the annihilation of their military. The response needs to be quick and automatic, because obviously if we have time to think about it, we have time for nuclear blackmail to have its effect.

And we have to let them know that an attack from North Korea will be viewed as an attack by China, and responded to in the very same way.

But frankly, our support for Taiwan, in any case, will be limited. Our military is no longer designed to sustain a war with China. At one time we were manned for a so-called "2-1/2 war" scenario, in which theoretically we could take on the Soviets, the Chinese, and the Cubans simultaneously.

Those days are long gone. Now a war with a Cuba-sized military is all we can handle.


19 posted on 07/15/2005 10:45:07 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

bump


20 posted on 07/15/2005 10:47:25 AM PDT by jonno (We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson