This once again shows how Demagogue-crats will walk over any previously held position in order to attack Bush, that's how pathologically partisan they've become. Other examples include at the outset of the Afghan war, Democrats and their media allies saying to wage a "credible" war on terror, Bush would have to go after other "terrorist-supporting states LIKE IRAQ." I remember that specific quote out of the smarmy mouth of Tom Daschle. These Demonization-crats only did this because they thought Bush too gutless a leader to do anything beyond Afghanistan and wanted to make him look bad when he stopped there. But Bush called their bluff and waged a comprehensive war on terror. So once again they reversed themselves to attack him on that too.
This has just gotten comical. These Democrats are like something out of a Monty Python sketch. I've never seen a political party as craven as this bunch of looney tunes.
I called Schieter's office yesterday and, as a New Yorker and constituent of senator Scheister, DEMANDED to know why he was not this outspoken when a national security felony was committed by Sandy Berger...the response, we will pass your concerns on to the senator...I also asked why senator schiester has such an interest on outing CIA employees today when he was one of 56 congressmen/women who voted against legislation making it a crime to reveal certain types of CIA agents in 1982...the response...we don't know why he voted against the bill in 1982.
I encourage everyone to pick up the phone and do the same...
The backfire on this has started. The dems called for a lynching before the trial. This is fine for the far left but not for people concerned about fair play.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)