Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cookcounty

Did Wilson mislead the Washington Post?

In his letter to Roberts and Rockefeller, Wilson responds (or pretends to respond) to a claim that isn’t trivial. He responds to a claim made by Chairman Roberts and two other Republicans—a charge made in the part of the report given over to “Additional Comments” from Committee members. Here is one of charges by the three senators—a murky charge which they flesh out by citing particular incidents:

ROBERTS/BOND/HATCH (page 443): Rather than speaking publicly about his actual experiences during his inquiry of the Niger issue, the former ambassador seems to have included information he learned from press accounts and from his beliefs about how the Intelligence Community would have or should have handled the information he provided.

In short, the senators charge that Wilson tended to say more than he actually knew. In part, the senators refer to a matter described in the body of the report—the part of the report unanimously accepted by the Committee. According to the Committee report, Wilson misstated to Walter Pincus of the Washington Post, in an interview for a 6/12/03 report—an interview conducted at a time when Wilson was still anonymous. According to the report, Wilson told Pincus that he had determined, as part of his trip, that the famous Niger documents were forged. The problem: Wilson had never seen these forged documents. Indeed, the documents weren’t even in US hands when he took his trip to Niger. According to the Committee report, Wilson “told Committee staff that he was the source” of the Pincus article. Here’s the way the Senate report recorded Wilson’s explanation for his apparent misstatement:

SENATE INTELLIGENCE REPORT (page 45): The former ambassador said that he may have “misspoken” to the reporter when he said he concluded the documents were “forged.” He also said he may have become confused about his own recollection after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in March 2003 that the names and dates on the documents were not correct and may have thought he had seen the names himself.


http://tinyurl.com/86usk


359 posted on 07/14/2005 7:28:15 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: kcvl
Hey kcvl .. this was asked to me earlier and I couldn't find anything

Though I'm sure Wilson testified before the grand jury .. I can't find anything stating for a fact that he did and I don't remember Wilson talking about it

Can you find anything
366 posted on 07/14/2005 7:31:53 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson