Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wampus SC
I'll take this in dismissive order, step-by-step:

And your #1173 was different from that how, other than I provide documentation?

You provided NO "documentation": you "provided" quotes ripped out of context in an effort to change the subject from your own base behavior in an attempt to dodge the question put to you. The question was put to you sir; please answer it, instead of trying to hide behind the skirts of evasion.

You can be so infinitely presumptuous as to think you can set time limits on everyone, but it doesn't work that way outside your head

Ah, but I "set" no "time limits" on anyone: I found it curious that you'd respond, ten days after the fact, to a post that was straightforward and unambiguous. When a post such as that goes so long unanswered the mentally astute among us assume one of two things: the respondents are incapable of answering, or they are unwilling to answer.

You are a curious third breed: someone congenitally unable to formulate a coherent answer, so he waits, like the intellectual coward you most certainly are, till he believes he will not garner a response.

I waited a decent interval so that anyone who believed you could take you up on your offer

That is simply a lie. You "waited" until you thought you wouldn't get a response by throwing some crap out early in the morning, and then hoping it wouldn't be noticed.

As you saw, nobody took your offer

And that was very telling about the type of specimen that makes up the ranks of the silly, ragged Lost Cause Squad around here: "confederates" who'd make Robert Lee puke to think he was in anyway associated with them; trash that would cause Stonewall Jackson to bellow "get them out of my Corps!"

It means nobody believed it

No, it "means" no one was willing to step up to the plate and be a man among your scummy associates. That's all.

You don't get it, but that wasn't about modernman and espazzola, it was about you. You. Examples of chances you had to show that your rhetoric about the level of discourse here wasn't empty and hypocritical. You passed them up. And you're still behaving the same, showing again that your high sounding words are empty, one sided, partisan propaganda

There is a term for this kind of quaint, dreamy nonsense: it is called projection. Indeed, I find it amusing that, over and over and over and over and over again, you simply will not answer the question put to you: do you, or do you not, believe it is appropriate to attack a person's parents because you're losing an argument with him? It's not a complicated question, or even one fraught with big philosophical queries: it's very simple. YES or NO.

Based on your sputtering so far, I think most decent people have their answer...

In short, you're a fraud. A fraud who continues to commit fraud, and can do nothing but commit more and more fraud

In short, you're a perpetual liar. A liar who continues to lie, and can do nothing but keep lying, over and over. And proud of it to boot...I wonder what else is lurking just beneath that barely concealed pointy hat?

And so does everyone else...

1,243 posted on 08/09/2005 2:00:25 PM PDT by A Jovial Cad ("A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1240 | View Replies ]


To: A Jovial Cad
Wow! Look at all those posts! Sure got you going, huh, cubby? I'll cut to the chase.

"answer the question put to you: do you, or do you not, believe it is appropriate to attack a person's parents because you're losing an argument with him? "

I'll dispute that I was losing, but answer the question.

I do NOT think it's appropriate to attack someone's parents. THAT'S WHY I DID IT! Now go figure.

'cause here we are. How about you? Do you think it's inappropriate to attack someone's parents in ALL cases? Or is it just inappropriate when certain people do it? Which is it?
1,249 posted on 08/09/2005 10:51:25 PM PDT by Wampus SC (Serf City here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies ]

To: A Jovial Cad
"That is simply a lie. You "waited" until you thought you wouldn't get a response by throwing some crap out early in the morning, and then hoping it wouldn't be noticed."

You're just being silly now. If I hadn't wanted a response from you, I wouldn't have addressed a post to you - one which you'd see the next time you logged onto FR regardless of the time it was posted. And a post is noticed whenever someone happens to come along and read it. Basic stuff. Sheesh.
1,250 posted on 08/09/2005 11:01:28 PM PDT by Wampus SC (Serf City here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson